Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

“That (letting it burn through) has been a rational option from the onset. There IS a plausible argument that the cure is worse than the disease...But it is not the moral option. At least not yet.”

Yea, and I’d like to see some other country try it first. The UK essentially said they would, then backed off. No other country that I know of has tried it, not even China, who could stand to lose a couple of hundred million old people.


220 posted on 03/23/2020 2:59:48 PM PDT by BobL (If some people here don't want to prep for Coronavirus, they can explain it to their families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: BobL

I believe the countries who were going to let it “burn through” may have changed their tune when they saw how many under 60 were ending up in the hospital


248 posted on 03/23/2020 3:17:27 PM PDT by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

To: BobL

China could still do a “burn through” with the rest of their country—only a very small percentage have been infected to date.


256 posted on 03/23/2020 3:22:50 PM PDT by cgbg (BOLO--escaped SNF resident--Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson