Replies

Re 3Days3Nights tweet
::Nancy is 100% owned by Trump since 2017, so she is playing a role designed to destroy all faith in the Democrat party by a certain date in exchange for a chance at a different sentence. She has ZERO leverage. Optics. Good for Trump. Bad for Dems.::

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I find that very hard to believe. Just too, too tidy.

Q Q said Pelosi is a puppet. He did not say whose. Regarding 3D3N, some of the tweets below lend some insight into him.

From a very short stroll around twitterville this morning, plan to collect more if I have time. Anyone wanting on/off this ping list, freepmail me.

1:25 video of POTUS:

“A society without religion cannot prosper, a nation without faith cannot endure because justice, goodness, and peace cannot prevail without the glory of almighty God.” -@realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/DsvK5MnGAI— GOP (@GOP) January 4, 2020

I asked a question earlier about why people believe the DEFINITIVE (key word here) answers given by anonymous Twitter accounts during their Q&A sessions. Guess someone didn't like me asking that question. pic.twitter.com/fErp88N63E— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) January 3, 2020

True brother. Did you ever see Eye The Spy's account?— Marv Hughes (@MarvHughes) January 4, 2020

That is an Eye the spy account. they give the same answers and type the same. It just vouched for a new account that is claiming to be eye the spy. Pretty entertaining. Sad thing is a lot of people think every word they say is truth— Brad ⭐️⭐️⭐️🇺🇸 (@gravano78) January 4, 2020

What clone are you referring to?? I’m everyday Joe Schmo and I get so tired of the “inside” rhetoric of Anons?? What is going on? I thought the purpose of sharing info was to get more people to see the “light”. Instead what I see is a bunch of Snob Anons. What gives??— MsMischief (@MsMischief3) January 4, 2020

The CIA has many accounts on Twitter. They're here to infiltrate the movement, confuse people and if possible, usurp Q's message.— Praying Medic (@prayingmedic) January 4, 2020

pic.twitter.com/zIEIGvviF7— Julian's Rum 🥃 (@JuliansRum) January 4, 2020

This “role playing” phrase kind of from the beginning always struck me as a cop out, or a “safe place” phrase, a new kind of word play to explain the inexplicable and served to help manage our anxiety levels and our expectations.

(Mainly for use against the reality of for so long seeing no indictments, no grand juries, *no arrests*, convictions, or even house confinements of the highly placed.)

” Are ya’ gonna believe ME, or your lying Eyes “.

Because it was our side using it, the phrase itself and the idea of it never really got much argument, and it was also conveniently unverifiable.

I think “role playing” doesn’t broadly sell in most all of these cases and can be really a little embarrassing over time to keep hearing.

But I don’t play chess, either. LOL! %:D/