It is, and many of them are potentially tangentially related, if at all, to the case against Flynn ... although they could be relevant in a selective or malicious prosecution motion ... which are more common than I thought.
One item that caught my eye that is directly on point ...
Former Acting Assistant Attorney General Mary McCord regarding the FBI's decision not to give Mr. Flynn a Title 18, Section 1001 warning, and the decision not to re-interview him despite the general practice of the FBI to give subjects that opportunity.
Goes straight to selective prosecution. The FBI usually gives people a chance to restate, or refresh memory, etc., and did not do so with Flynn. That fact alone, on top of express earlier findings by intereviewers that they thought Flynn was being truthful, makes this case smell like selective prosecution.
I notice to, No. 22, McCabe's reported "first we screw (cough cough) Flynn, then we screw Trump."
Bringing this back to a Q point, how do you get evidence into the public eye or into the record? Flynn case is a venue for that, even though the press won't touch the details.
how do you get evidence into the public eye or into the record? Flynn case is a venue for that, even though the press won’t touch the details.
_________
So true...time to shine a bright light on it somehow...
A little tidbit from the Motion to Compel document that will fall into a well probably.
Section II, item 16 of todays motion reveals that Joseph Mifsud was present or “planted” at the “Russia Today” dinner with Putin.
No mention of him in this Reuters piece ...
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.111.0.pdf
Bringing this back to a Q point, how do you get evidence into the public eye or into the record? Flynn case is a venue for that, even though the press won't touch the details.
Q has said more than once "How do you get (this or that) legally presented as evidence?" in connection with Flynn. (Paraphrasing obviously.)
But I think the media will touch it, gingerly, some of them. And the "alternate" media which not only means of course twitter but sites like The Hill, The Daily Caller, Fox, Washington Times and others will definitely cover it.