Posted on 07/26/2019 9:05:43 AM PDT by ransomnote
Or maybe you're retarted.
Who's to say?
Shut up troll
The proceedings unfold in the form of a trial, with each side having the right to call witnesses and perform cross-examinations. The House members, who are given the collective title of managers during the course of the trial, present the prosecution case, and the impeached official has the right to mount a defense with his or her own attorneys as well. Senators must also take an oath or affirmation that they will perform their duties honestly and with due diligence. After hearing the charges, the Senate usually deliberates in private. The Constitution requires a two-thirds super majority to convict a person being impeached. The Senate enters judgment on its decision, whether that be to convict or acquit, and a copy of the judgment is filed with the Secretary of State. Upon conviction in the Senate, the official is automatically removed from office and may also be barred from holding future office. The trial is not an actual criminal proceeding and more closely resembles a civil service termination appeal in terms of the contemplated deprivation. Therefore, the removed official may still be liable to criminal prosecution under a subsequent criminal proceeding. The President may not grant a pardon in the impeachment case, but may in any resulting Federal criminal case.
Haha. Brief and to the point.
And Q didn’t seem to know that!
I’ve known it since 7th grade Civics.
It took you to explain it for him .... or at least make excuses for him.
Q probly shoulda wrote out what you posted, or the Constitutional definition of the process, instead of the commonly understood one word to satisfy the dork community.
Cause as we know. brevity isn't important.
Bad Q, bad.
And Q didn’t seem to know that!
I’ve known it since 7th grade Civics.
It took you to explain it for him .... or at least make excuses for him.
Do you even understand the context of which Q is referring to in this case? You have to first understand what the dems really want and that is the complete removal of this President. To get to that point requires 2/3’s of the Senate and that’s NOT happening.
CGato
Lol keep reaching
How is your maga coalition lawsuit going?
Reminder re: impeachment.
2/3rd Senate vote required to impeach POTUS.
The Constitution requires a two-thirds super majority to convict a person being impeached. The Senate enters judgment on its decision, whether that be to convict or acquit
And by 'dork community', I mean you.
Now, let me post the definition of dork, so you aren't confused about the meaning.
(excerpt)
dork
/dôrk/
noun
noun: dork; plural noun: dorks
1.
informal•North American
a contemptible, socially inept person.
I got blow back yesterday for saying Cummings is in Italy. Anyone on here who can go to the Forbidden City and ID the perp? I know he and John Lewis look a lot a like.
Tell me was Slick Willie impeached?
No never convicted he was censured.
No one cares about your stupid semantics
Troll
:^D My RN son's first name starts with Q . . . Can bagster compete? He's OK as far as it goes... tee hee
heh
Anonymous29 Jul 2019 - 10:01:13 AM>>7243401
The weblink wont open
screenshot_1-46.png
I believe this issue with evangelicals is connected to the deep state.
Evangelicals tend to be very conservative.
Hey...when did you sneak back in ?
Nice to have you back...
I’ll theory with you a little, if that’s okay.. I think something was going on. Rosie was probably delighted to start a Special Council, even hoping DS would be able to nail Trump, as the outcome.
But first he had to come up with a document that fired Comey for Cause and to sign off on it. (Not the President.)
At least Two reasons for Rosie cheerfully complying intersect at this point.
1) Comey wanted to force an investigation of Trump, requiring an appointment of a Special Counsel, therefore, Comey leaked to his Leftist professor pal who leaked to the Media. Mission accomplished.
2) And, POTUS required of Rosey to recommend all Cause that Comey should be fired, thus, POTUS “lets” Rosenstein fire Comey. Mission accomplished.
Rosenstein keeps his “ j o b”, and he satisfies both Comey (DS) and also the POTUS.
Then, maybe, Trump unloads on Rosenstein. Maybe Trump knowing his own innocence either wanted a carte blanche Mueller investigation, himself, or he simply trumped Rosie’s appointment of a Special Counsel by turning it into a Sting operation of his own.
Rosenstein gets fingered to give Mueller the carte blanche to hire all black hat operators, a full authorization to go anywhere, in order to flush out the JD and FBI for corruption, unlawful leaks and slandering, useful for framing a president.
Maybe Rosenstein was quite dirty and certainly a pompous NeverTrumper, and was flipped to squeal and to save his career, or for a lighter sentence?
If Q intel has it all, POTUS is certainly in the driver’s seat, able to flip most anyone or expose anyone, to bring down the house of corruption. What do you think?
Did POTUS even need to flip Rosenstein?
Does POTUS even need to flip Anyone?
I mean, if he has it all......?
mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.