It’s not about the pool or doomsday. Your fear is of a potential harm that has not occurred yet and may not occur.
The baby’s hunger is real and immediate need. Just from a legal point of view, potential but unrealized harms don’t count for squat.
Being denied food is an actual harm.
Pools notoriously sap the energy of children making them voraciously hungry, so all the planning in the world won’t always work.
Would you reference the men who refuse to mentor any longer as having a fear of something that hasn’t happened, or may not happen?
Would you reference fathers who’s wives lie about them during divorce as having unrealistic fears?
Here you seem to completely dismiss any need to cover up, or use a breast pump. Sorry, that breast bump thing works for most mothers. If you can’t use one, then perhaps going to the pool is just a lousy idea.
The onus is placed on the man to either sit there and risk some charge a woman can think up, or leave.
Nonsense.
Pools also have urine and fecal matter in the water. During summer months there is also a risk of too much exposure to the sun. Attempts to put sunscreen on a small child is also a risk.
Funny how none of that seems to have popped into your mind.
I’ll stand with what I have already stated, and you can still sit there and try to defend the defenseless.