Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Have Reduced the Forecast of Sea Level Rise Seven Times Due to Melting of the Antarctic
The Maritime Herald ^ | February 8, 2019 | SVILEN PETROV

Posted on 02/10/2019 3:07:18 PM PST by Textide

The destruction of the Antarctic ice sheet may not lead to such a catastrophic rise in the level of the oceans, as previously thought. In a new study, the authors calculated that instead of growing by a meter or more by 2100, a growth of 14-15 cm is likely, writes N + 1.

At the same time, the melting of the ice of Greenland and Antarctica is not fully taken into account in modern climate models, as it will lead to even more destabilization of the regional climate. Both studies on this are published in the journal Nature.

The melting of the ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica is considered one of the most dangerous global consequences of climate change caused by human activity, which will lead to an increase in the level of the World Ocean. There are very significant reserves of ice, and the rate of its melting has increased in recent years. However, the range of estimates of the speed of this process in the future and the final rise in the level of the oceans is quite large. So, in 2016, in one of the works, it was assumed that by 2100 due to the sharp destruction of the Antarctic ice sheet, the level of the World Ocean could rise by a meter or more.

In the first study, Tamzin Edwards from King’s College London and her colleagues question this prediction. According to Edwards, who is quoted by the college press service, scientists re-analyzed data on ice loss and ocean level 3 million years ago, 125 thousand years ago and in the last 25 years and estimated the likelihood of rapid destruction of unstable sea areas of Antarctic glaciers, which the authors 2016 was associated with a meter increase in the level of the oceans. The hypothesis of such destruction received the abbreviated name MICI (marine ice cliff instability).

They found that MICI does not necessarily explain the dynamics of sea level in the past, and without this the probability that the level will grow by more than 39 centimeters by 2100 is only about 5 percent. Edwards notes that in their model, even if the Antarctic glaciers really will collapse rapidly, the maximum increase in sea level will not exceed half a meter, and the most likely growth will be 14-15 cm. At the same time, scientists cannot completely eliminate the MICI phenomenon: they only talk about that more research is needed in this area.

In the second article, Edwards and Nick Golledge of Queen Victoria University in Wellington and their co-authors write that current climate models do not fully take into account the consequences of the destruction of the ice of Greenland and the Antarctic, which will slow down the Atlantic Ocean and further melt the Antarctic ice due to “locking” of warm water in the Southern Ocean (climatologists call such self-enhancing processes positive feedback processes). In addition, according to the authors of the article, the melting of ice in the warming scenario of 3-4 degrees compared with the middle of the XIX century will lead to a less predictable climate and an increase in the scale of extreme weather events.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: antarctic; antarctica; berniesanders; climatechange; climatechangefraud; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; greenland; greennewdeal; newyork; ocasiocortez; vermont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Some climate scientists are actually doing science. Now to get some of this downstream to the communists pushing for the complete reorganization of economic systems, or at least those that support them....
1 posted on 02/10/2019 3:07:18 PM PST by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Textide

A big nothing-burger, w/ cheese.


2 posted on 02/10/2019 3:10:55 PM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Ping.


3 posted on 02/10/2019 3:11:36 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide
All the models that claim to predict events years from now are bogus.

We simply cannot do it.

There is no way to validate the models.

We do not have the data.

4 posted on 02/10/2019 3:13:07 PM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

Nevertheless, just to be sure, we should cease all air and motor travel. We will be the only country that does this, but America must lead by example. We will find a way. Think of the children. We can accomplish this is 12 years by increasing punitive taxation and shaming via media outlets.


5 posted on 02/10/2019 3:14:18 PM PST by BusterDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

Sounds like something less than “settled science.”


6 posted on 02/10/2019 3:14:39 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide

I like how they freak out when any ice bergs break off the antarctic ice shelves, but all that ice has always been in the sea which means the net total sea rise is near ZERO anyways if it all melted, we only need to worry about ice in the interior starts melting.


7 posted on 02/10/2019 3:14:57 PM PST by GraceG ("If I post an AWESOME MEME, STEAL IT! JUST RE-POST IT IN TWO PLACES PLEASE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
There is no way to validate the models.

Sure there is, are you kidding?

The models are valid if they help us advance our political agenda. Are you new?

8 posted on 02/10/2019 3:15:48 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Textide

How does the icecap simultaneously lose ice-melt while the volume of ice increases on Antarctica?


9 posted on 02/10/2019 3:17:31 PM PST by arthurus ('o'll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
...we only need to worry about ice in the interior starts melting.

Oh, that's happening, in the Antarctic.

It's being caused by heat coming up from below.

This earth-generated heat is, of course, America's fault, even though we're about 8000 miles away from the South Pole.

10 posted on 02/10/2019 3:18:19 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

More than previously ice is apparently flowing iin the glaciers to the edge and breaking off as floes and bergs because more ice is forming in the middle of the landmass forcing the glaciers to move more voluminously.


11 posted on 02/10/2019 3:20:08 PM PST by arthurus (|'o'|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Textide

East coast sea level changes... post glacial rebound?? http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/sea-level-rise-2/recovering-from-an-ice-age/


12 posted on 02/10/2019 3:21:54 PM PST by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; Textide

This is a NOAA webpage which has looked at increments of 50 year sea level trends at many sites across the US. (and world sites if you click around a little)
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8723170
Click on the tab that says, “Variation of 50-Year Relative Sea Level Trends” you can look at different gauges around the country for different 50 year averages.
In most cases the 50 year intervals show declining rates of sea levels on the order of 3-5 millimeters which then level back towards the baseline. That’s millimeters over 5 decades! It’s all BS!


13 posted on 02/10/2019 3:23:54 PM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Oh, the scientists have declared climate change is settled but they can’t definitively state whether boys are boys or maybe girls, or something...


14 posted on 02/10/2019 3:26:06 PM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt
Oh, the scientists have declared climate change is settled but they can’t definitively state whether boys are boys or maybe girls, or something...

Perhaps with a few billion more in research funding, they may be able to narrow that one down.

15 posted on 02/10/2019 3:29:11 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

How does the icecap simultaneously lose ice-melt while the volume of ice increases on Antarctica?


This is one of the most confounding of modern mysteries - scientists everywhere are vying for large grants to study this anomaly but that presents a problem since the the new green deal will soak up much of the available tax revenues and bond sales. Ink will be in short supply so the option of just printing more money is limited. Using metal coins for money are also out of question since mining is forbidden to due to carbon sequestration protocols and the like.

As soon as those new green deal fiscal problems are solved, the scientists promise to get on it right quick.


16 posted on 02/10/2019 3:32:01 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Textide

Said Climate Change advocates do little to make sense.


17 posted on 02/10/2019 3:35:44 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists call 'em what you will they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

[ ...we only need to worry about ice in the interior starts melting.

Oh, that’s happening, in the Antarctic.

It’s being caused by heat coming up from below.

This earth-generated heat is, of course, America’s fault, even though we’re about 8000 miles away from the South Pole. ]

Because the CO2 in the air is quantum linked to the lava under Antarctica and when that heats up it is causing the lava to heat up thusly melting the ice!!!!

I too can come up with GoreBull warming BS junk science!!! XD


18 posted on 02/10/2019 3:47:55 PM PST by GraceG ("If I post an AWESOME MEME, STEAL IT! JUST RE-POST IT IN TWO PLACES PLEASE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Textide

Reality does not matter if you mean well.

.

.

Oh, and you have to be a liberal too.


19 posted on 02/10/2019 3:53:55 PM PST by airborne (I don't always scream at the TV but when I do it's hockey season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Because the CO2 in the air is quantum linked to the lava under Antarctica and when that heats up it is causing the lava to heat up thusly melting the ice!!!!

Anthropomorphic quantum entanglement, of course! Why didn't I think of that?

20 posted on 02/10/2019 3:59:21 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson