Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steven W.; Salvavida; MadMax, the Grinning Reaper; reed13k; Publius; Liz; LS; Defiant

ping to the new thread and #17

do you think this relates to DJT’s request to declass???


33 posted on 01/25/2019 11:01:48 PM PST by bitt (forget the electric chair..we're gonna need electric bleachers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: bitt

I don’t think it’s related to declass. Declass wouldn’t be involved in a grand jury matter. Once declass happens, grand jury material might be more susceptible to becoming public, but it appears that the motion involves something else, and the argument is being made that prior redactions can be made public. Had declass already occurred, maybe it would involve declass.


179 posted on 01/26/2019 10:42:58 AM PST by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson