Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

I don’t think it’s related to declass. Declass wouldn’t be involved in a grand jury matter. Once declass happens, grand jury material might be more susceptible to becoming public, but it appears that the motion involves something else, and the argument is being made that prior redactions can be made public. Had declass already occurred, maybe it would involve declass.


179 posted on 01/26/2019 10:42:58 AM PST by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant; bitt; ransomnote

I continue to ponder this ... consider this case reaches the SCOTUS and goes right to Chief Justice, nothing has leaked. It must be something big and something that is not helpful to MSM narrative. It’s not related to DECLAS and it’s not necessarily something that can be DECLAS per say because it’s held by the Court(s).

Consider - this is something so high level that it went to CJ Roberts and is highly classified. My thinking is something related to Hussein or foreign intel i.e. GHCQ

TBD ;)


181 posted on 01/26/2019 10:57:17 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

To: Defiant

thanks for your response to post 33....

“Once declass happens, grand jury material might be more susceptible to becoming public, but it appears that the motion involves something else,...”

see post #297 and #313 and what do you think??


319 posted on 01/26/2019 1:16:38 PM PST by bitt (forget the electric chair..we're gonna need electric bleachers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson