This is one of the assertions that was made on the non-Q threads by Q supporters that infuriated the non-Q supporters.
I'm not infuriated by it, but I do recognize it as a logical failure.
I supported Trump from his announcement forward. There was a huge Ted Cruz fan-club here on Free Republic, I suspect some of today's Trump supporters were part of that fan club. That's fine, I'm not holding a grudge.
But I am second to none in backing Trump, even with my Q agnosticism.
As I keep saying, eventually we will know.
Well all thinking people will know. Like we know that Sessions was a disaster for Trump, Trump got sick of him and Trump fired him.
Now some of believe Q more than Trump. You still say Mueller was a white hat, Mueller was doing critical work for Trump, the Mueller firing was a subterfuge. You still Trust Mueller. Where as I take POTUS at his word.
I'd say that's denial. But I still wouldn't say "you don't support Trump". Logically we can disagree about the accuracy of Q statements and interpretations and still both support the President.
Free Republic is full of Trump supporters, and the vast majority of them don't believe in Q. One does not instantly become a Trump opponent by taking a dim view of Q.
I could be wrong about this, about Mueller for instance, but with each passing day it looks less like I'm wrong.
I'm looking forward to next January. A lot.
For what it’s worth I actually agree with you.
> I could be wrong about this, about Mueller for instance, but with each passing day it looks less like I’m wrong.
You’ll be surprised or you won’t. Except for Flynn they were all dirty players and that’s putting it nicely.
-SB
So?
Omelletes….eggs...
Can't support Trump if you work against his op. Simple logic. Basic math. Settled science.
#AskTheDonald
Bagster
Look forward to it somewhere else.
There's a good lad.
Bagster