Yes, maam, I agree. Who would not trust Sessions to care for their grands?
I was a huge fan of Sessions and convinced of his principles and unassuming posture in the Senate. A marvel with no ambition, but for his fine work to be made perfect and convincing when he rose to speak or intervene.
I am ever anxious, now, to wait and to see AG Sessions’ work product at Justice to reveal that same excellence, and amount to everything Q suggests, and that it proves to be much more than making the Huber appointment, whose on-the-ground work is suppose to be very promising.
I would be more than happy to see Sessions come out of all this, a hero. That would be glorious. But, please, the recusal was a stake driven into a lot of hearts that must be healed somehow. I am eager for it and pray that it shall be.
I don’t think Sessions had any choice but to recuse. And except for the point made earlier about the victim in a crime not being allowed to prosecute the perpetrator, I count it tragic for we as Amercans that Sessions was in that position.
I do think he would have tendered his resignation at any point POTUS requested. As such, I think POTUS has used Sessions investigatory skills and his position for brilliant optics. I’m not of the mind that his recusal kept him from making sure Huber and company did a “Sessions style” thorough investigation. I’m hoping that to prove true.