That there is some mighty creative speculation; particularly when such results would require attendant legal rubrics that do not currently exist.
Things change. At the time Social Security was introduced ("currently" at that time) the SS# was not to be used for identification. Now ("currently" at this time) it is so used.
Nobody gets more creative than a greedy lawyer. I’m not a lawyer but I’m willing to bet that some of them are way ahead of me on this. And it doesn’t require much speculation at all just a DNA connection.