[Hostage]

> "However, as I pointed out, he explained in GREAT DETAIL and rudimentary fashion (crayons) WHY we should TRUST SESSIONS."

No, there is no "we should" trust Sessions in #2164. Here are the pertinent words from that post:

SESSIONS and FLYNN [targeted] for [immediate] removal/recusal? 
SESSIONS Senate CONF vote?
[RR] Senate CONF vote?
Reconcile.
IF SESSIONS WASN'T A THREAT WHY WAS HE THE PRIMARY TARGET?
WHY WAS IT CRITICAL TO MOVE [RR] INTO DOJ ACTING AG RE: APPOINTMENT OF MUELLER / DIR SC OVERSIGHT [AUTH]?
IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR ENEMY IS PLANNING HOW DO YOU PREPARE STRATEGICALLY?
THINK TODAY.
LEFT SUPPORTING SESSIONS?
LEFT DEFENDING SESSIONS?
STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE?

Q is merely reminding Anons that the Office of AG is a threat to the Dems/Left. Doesn't matter if Sessions is in the seat or Bugs Bunny, so long as it's not their guy, it's a huge threat to them.

So the AG was targeted immediately, first at the confirmation hearing, then for recusal. But RR sailed through because he is one of their guys. That's what Q is pointing out and Q goes further that because POTUS is dissatisfied with Session's performance, especially the recusal, and that dissatisfaction is genuine, that suddenly now the Dems/Left love the guy, they 'trust' the guy. And Q is pointing out that the Dems/Left are now using Sessions against POTUS by threatening a campaign issue if Sessions is fired, and certain GOP members of Congress have cautioned POTUS against firing Sessions. Hence, Sessions will be allowed to stay in place until after the Midterms.

Q hasn't said "TRUST SESSIONS" for a very long time. That correlates with POTUS's changing view of Sessions. POTUS doesn't dislike or 'hate' Sessions, POTUS merely wants a super competent AG in the seat and there are many to choose from, but POTUS's hands are tied, he is frustrated and he is said publicly that he is frustrated and he has said so sincerely.

Sessions is confined to matters outside the deep state coup plot because of his recusal. And the coup plot is huge, so Sessions took himself out of the most important DOJ focus of the Trump presidency. Sessions is confined to areas of border, drugs, child trafficking. But there are areas of intersection with the deep state coup. So Sessions prosecutes child trafficking ad comes full stop when it leads to the Clinton Foundation. This neuters Sessions.

I first noticed Sessions's deficiencies early on in the Bundy/Hammond cases. In those cases, the prosecutors violated law and practice by hiding exculpatory evidence that the defense uncovered. What did the newly confirmed Sessions do? Why he acted the proverbial good old boy get-along-to-go-along, "gee, I'm your AG and I'm here to let you know I support you", this to the corrupt Obama era prosecutors. Idiot. Same pattern with the recusal, "Gee. I wouldn't want to step on any toes now would I?". Idiot.

And what did POTUS do? He did what Trump always does, he plans how to get around difficulties. He has truly brilliant attorneys working for him in the WH and they all put in place a plan to take down the Swamp while bypassing Sessions and his 'recusal'.

[bagster]

STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE?

The answer to this question is an obvious yes.

There is strategic advantage in setting Sessions up to be viewed as you and the left views him.

Then you have to decide if this strategic advantage was engineered or occurred independently and is now ripe to be taken advantage of. Is that what you believe?

Or do you believe that there is no strategic advantage in this (as I believe) orchestrated situation has NO strategic advantage?

There is a choice to make here. We can accept things as presented to us, or we can think with a little bit of sophistication, understanding that those who HAVE orchestrated this affair are strategic, long term thinkers with a PLAN.

I have a hard time believing that Trump and his team of military strategists (including the Q team) are just muddling through this reacting to events.

Maybe I'm just a an idiot, though, and maybe you're a genius.

I've been wrong before.

Either way, one of us is right and the other wrong. But the right people know the truth. And the truth is out there.

No sense even arguing about it. Discussing it is almost a waste of time.

Bagster

[Steven W.]

There have been numerous posts that say, “TRUST SESSIONS” and “TRUST WRAY”. Not recently, of course, because it’s hard to get the DS to the point where they love + defend SESSIONS at the same time! In fact it would be impossible to get to that point if the DS & resistance types could see anything otherwise.

re “Sessions is recused from most important fight. Recusal means he cannot even receive a memo about RR and Mueller plot to bring down POTUS.”

Our friend should think logically, think optics.

Sessions is not recused from the fight - he is recused from dealing with RR & the Mule - otherwise he has positioned himself perfectly to address such matters cleanly from the other side, via Horowitz + Huber & MIL, who are monitoring + setting up the DS & Hussein + HRC team without a single taint from the stink of the Mule op.

Any other construct and the DEMs would be screaming, “WITCH HUNT” and that Sessions is tainted. Instead the WITCH HUNT goes on undercover, now with DS approval + “love”.

Once considered & contemplated, it seems obvious why Sessions would leap to any way in which to become “recused” from the front side & free + able on the back end.

When we see the FISA[20] we’ll inevitably learn whether RR continued the fraud or turned the tables. This is why “Q” notes that it will be RR who then / now has to move on, one way or another.

I believe today is the last primary of the election season leaving Friday as a prime date to begin DECLAS or move in other aspects. Next week Flynn will be back before Judge Sullivan for sentencing and the 210 window for availability of a replacement via succession for RR will be open.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Video: Exposing the Deep State
(start at 1:58 in...)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGJ2jMZ-gaI

[9YearLurker]

Fair question is what is RR doing there, as he is now in effect the AG. Pence chaired the transition committee and it wouldn’t surprise me if RR had been his guy.

[bagster]

Q hasn't said "TRUST SESSIONS" for a very long time.

I do have to insist that you stop saying that as proof of anything. There are other ways of saying TRUST SESSIONS, and Q has done it REPEATEDLY in quite understandable ways. Including the post you refer to as "explaining to anons".

I really must insist, and I appeal to your ability to think logically and "connect dots".

Bagster

[buffaloguy]

The Trump collusion portion of this operation is the smallest part of the whole, which is huge. Sessions recused himself from nothing. There is no there there. He has been left alone to do the attack on the deep state without the attention of the screamers of MSM. Part of the plan.

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

Do you realize Sessions can un-recuse himself as fast as he recused... brilliant move

[mongrel]

You’ve written quite a few lengthy posts trying to prove your point on Sessions. I also noticed you had this to say on another thread:

“Oh look! It’s a lo-IQ Q-snit showing a fartrous presence.”

What is your general impression of Q and those who follow Q?

[Hostage]

Some choice graphics from Q link twitter to put a smile on our faces this morning:

[BlueMondaySkipper]

You might want to check out post 2044 from 8/31/18 before your misinterpretation of Sessions takes further root. You seem very insistent on getting us to all board the wrong train here for some reason.