Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

I can tell just by the picture that it isn’t a day over 9473 years old!. What clown scientist states its 13k?I want the job of looking for footprints! These scientists need to subscribe to “creation” magazine out of Australia.


2 posted on 03/29/2018 1:20:25 AM PDT by mythenjoseph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mythenjoseph

I’m pretty sure the age estimate is based on the last time that area wasn’t underwater...


4 posted on 03/29/2018 1:36:49 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mythenjoseph

No, they do science.


12 posted on 03/29/2018 2:41:35 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mythenjoseph

“The researchers uncovered 29 human footprints of at least three different sizes in these sediments, which radiocarbon dating estimated to be around 13,000 years old. Measurements and digital photographic analyses revealed that the footprints probably belonged to two adults and a child, all barefoot. “

I’m a creationist. Without doubt.
To me this is proof of mankind heeding the Lords command to “Go forth and multiply”.
I find it all very interesting.


18 posted on 03/29/2018 6:49:37 AM PDT by oldvirginian ("The people built this country. And it is the people who are making America great again.” D TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson