Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter; Natufian
"Nor do you address the fact that technology was nothing in ‘61 compared to what it is today. Personally, I absolutely do not believe such a tiny infant would have been allowed on a 2,83 mile flight back then."

You think in 1961 air travel was more restrictive than it is today? Even today with all the technology, the FAA allows children under the age of two years to sit unrestrained on their parent's lap. Even though this is a known safety issue.

Looking at various airline websites - Southwest allows two week old infants to fly and Alaska Airlines says they have no age restrictions but recommends that family doctor gives an okay.

Alaska Airlines:

"While there is no minimum age for infants traveling with us, check with your doctor if you're unsure your infant should be traveling via plane."

https://www.alaskaair.com/content/travel-info/policies/traveling-with-lap-infants

"why no one remembers her going to the hospital or coming home, why an address was used on the BC at which SA was NOT living, etc. etc."

But it was the address where her parents' lived and where she lived according to the 1961-1962 Polk Directory for Honolulu.

Btw, what is your theory as to why SA would have rushed out of HI under the circumstances? Had she given birth there, she had many reasons to remain. Why would she have undertaken such an upheaval in her life?

From the August 31, 1961 it would appear the transfer to UofW was planned for sometime. My guess is she left to get away from her husband.

Similar to when Leslie Lynch King Jr"s mother left her husband when he was two weeks old and went from Omaha, Nebraska to Grand Rapids, Michigan.

135 posted on 12/12/2017 10:20:08 AM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan

Honestly, I get so sick of Obots I could puke. This has all been discussed before. It’s incredible that you continue to make the same discredited claims. The only possible explanation is that Obotism is a mental illness.

Cindy Pratt lived at the address listed on the birth certificate. She affirmed that SA lived there in the fall of ‘60. David Maraniss documented in his book that SA did not live there before or after giving birth.

Maraniss spent many months in Honolulu. He is a diehard Obot. If there was any chance SA was living at that address during the timeframe in question, he’d have documented it.

As long as you’re just making garbage up, why not postulate a better reason for Stanley Ann to rush off to Seattle. She never lived with Obama Sr, and there is not a scrap of actual evidence that she needed to flee from him. Just because a thought occurs in your imagination does not transform it into a fact or evidence.


137 posted on 12/12/2017 10:37:22 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

To: 4Zoltan

‘You think in 1961 air travel was more restrictive than it is today?’

When it comes to newborns, yes I do. There have been advances in cabin air pressure stabilization even in my lifetime. To suggest it was as reliably regulated in ‘61 as it is today is stupid. Why would an airline risk damage to a newborn’s ears when they didn’t have to? That makes no sense on any account.


138 posted on 12/12/2017 10:49:25 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson