To: Timpanagos1
I would not pay 10 cents to buy that to use as a backdrop for an outdoor urinal. It’s ugly.
That is not art. Art is beautiful because it reflects the harmony of nature. This reflects the cynical scratchings of a talentless fool.
3 posted on
05/21/2017 10:44:41 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Acting consistently in a way that is contrary to nature results in insanity.)
To: I want the USA back
Art is NOT necessarily beautiful.
![](http://briceamadrid.r.b.f.unblog.fr/files/2007/02/guernica.jpg)
But I agree that the piece in question is ugly and pretty pointless.
11 posted on
05/21/2017 11:00:35 AM PDT by
Artemis Webb
(Ted Kennedy burns in hell.)
To: I want the USA back
Modern art has abandoned and rejected beauty. To quote an “artist” (Grosz) from early in the Twentieth Century, “I drew and painted from a spirit of contradiction, and tried by means of my work to convince the world that it is hideous, sick and dishonest.”
15 posted on
05/21/2017 11:05:47 AM PDT by
Hiddigeigei
("Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish," said Dionysus - Euripides)
To: I want the USA back
As I’ve said before, “Art, today, can be a booger with a hair in it!”
48 posted on
05/21/2017 2:14:29 PM PDT by
Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
(Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson