To: spirited irish
Well said.
I excelled in actual hard science, and garnered two awards in same (along with multiple awards in mathematics). Yet I am called anti-science because I dispute the dark fantasy that is a result of the rejection of God the Creator.
Macro-Evolution is non-replicable; it is therefore not a verifiable theory.
49 posted on
02/22/2017 2:10:11 PM PST by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
To: YogicCowboy
Bingo. And that means it’s just as much faith-based as creationism.
52 posted on
02/22/2017 2:21:23 PM PST by
afsnco
(18 of 20 in AF JAG)
To: YogicCowboy
Thank-you. Hard science has been an invaluable asset to Western civilization. How tragic though that magic and/or occult science from the time of Sumeria has deceptively and disastrously wrapped itself in the cloth of empirical science.
So when magic science worshippers label you anti-science, take it as a compliment :-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson