Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: learner
Challenges have to be file by certain dates in order to prevent just this sort of thing. Also, as I recall, Florida was a little late certifying their votes in 2000, yet their votes were still counted.

What is missing from this whole process is a requirement for standing. Why does a candidate who has zero chance of winning the election, even after a recount, have the right to demand a recount in the first place? If Hillary wants a recount she should have to demand one herself.

We've all gotten use to the casual way Hillary lies, the way she simply ignores inconvenient laws, and the smug disdain she has for ordinary people. But have you ever noticed what a complete coward she is?

45 posted on 11/27/2016 6:15:54 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeeSharp
Why does a candidate who has zero chance of winning the election, even after a recount, have the right to demand a recount in the first place?

Good question. So If I was a "candidate", even a write in "candidate". And the only vote I got was mine. Then one person has the power to delay the vote count and disenfranchise millions of voters? That's crazy.

139 posted on 11/27/2016 8:30:38 AM PST by 386wt (I said that's crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson