Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A shrinking Army aims to keep citizen-soldiers combat ready
Associated Press ^ | Sep 16, 2016 4:42 PM EDT | Russ Bynum

Posted on 09/16/2016 5:28:09 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Before citizen-soldiers of the 48th Infantry Brigade deployed to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Georgia National Guard troops spent months training away from their families and day jobs as they prepared for war. Now a shrinking Army wants them able to get ready for combat sooner.

The brigade’s 4,200 soldiers are the first of 13 National Guard and Army Reserve units nationwide chosen to test a new role that pairs them with commanders on active-duty who will oversee their training.

The Pentagon hopes the change will make the Guard and Reserve troops better prepared to fight overseas at a time when the Army has roughly 100,000 fewer full-time soldiers than it did at the height of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: armyreserve; citizensoldiers; nationalguard; usarmy

1 posted on 09/16/2016 5:28:09 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The brigade’s 4,200 soldiers are the first of 13 National Guard and Army Reserve units nationwide chosen to test a new role that pairs them with commanders on active-duty who will oversee their training.

This is nothing new. It's been done before, multiple times.

2 posted on 09/16/2016 5:30:14 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Vote Trump. Defeat the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Reset America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

What they are doing is giving the AD component more training control and approval authority.

Great plan until, say, Katrina hits...


3 posted on 09/16/2016 5:34:32 PM PDT by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

Also keeps a lot of folks out of the reserves.

yes I know your employer is supposed to allow you to go, but realistically, unless you have a government position, being deployed for a month~6 weeks of training every other or third year instead of a predictable 2 week AT means that very few critical positions can be held by reservists. Which means you do not advance in your civilian job, even if they keep a position for you.


4 posted on 09/16/2016 5:39:14 PM PDT by Frederick303
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Frederick303

The plan is also to train two 3 day weekends per month plus a 30 day annual training period. What’s really up here is active duty wants to break the National Guard. They floated this same plan in the 80s.


5 posted on 09/16/2016 6:56:20 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk (Hey Newbomb, where's your brothers ElCamino ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Resume the draft.


6 posted on 09/16/2016 7:23:11 PM PDT by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

No No No. Just put the military bases in swing states. Next have them TRAIN for warfare 20 hours a week and pay them for 40. Last, let them work in retail 20-30 hours to make an extra buck-deployable on a moments notice. Stateside all I remember is make-work jobs on the base. Total waste of manpower. Cleaned a lot of toilets too.


7 posted on 09/16/2016 7:37:06 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Newbomb Turk

Break the Guard. That might be the end result, whether or not it is deliberate. If we want a full time military, pay them or conscript them or both. We’ve had good conscripted military operations before.


8 posted on 09/16/2016 7:55:30 PM PDT by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Newbomb Turk

Wow, if they want that kind of commitment I do not see how they will keep anyone but unemployed guys. Not many wives will be too keen on hubby being away 6 days a month plus 30 days in summer. That is 96 days of service a year, with the training schools necessary to advance likely being on top of that (PLDC, BNCOC, etc). Right now it is about 36 days a year, with the weekend drills being a lot more like 1.5 day drills, Saturday morning until Sunday afternoon. The family sees something of Dad even on a drill weekend, at least Sunday dinner.

Now to the employer that is 44 days of lost time (2 x 11 months +22 days for 1 active month). In addition to that you have to add your vacation (15 days), sick time (5 days) plus holidays (9 to 10). That is almost 15 weeks out of the year lost. No way a vital employee could be gone that much.

It also means the young chaps with a just a few years of work experience will have to drop out as well, unless they have government jobs or are unemployed.

Totally unrealistic.


9 posted on 09/16/2016 9:38:07 PM PDT by Frederick303
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

You must have been in during Nixon/Ford/Carter. During the Reagan era it seemed we were in the field all the time.


10 posted on 09/17/2016 4:54:55 AM PDT by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson