Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

“NASA can’t afford ...” there it is the money argument - what they are really saying is forget both, get on with climate change and muslim outreach.

The logical thing is to do both - the Moon and then on to Mars - far more economical and far safer.

But that will be up to the Chinese as the US will continue to blankly stare into its collective navel hoping that some one drops off a load of free stuff.

And we are going no where else until the educational system gets fixed and we return to the academic standards of at least 1936. If not, pack it in, move to China or do something else.


13 posted on 02/04/2016 3:31:04 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PIF

I took a tour of Johnson Space Center two years ago, a/k/a “The Angry Birds Exhibit.” They showed us the planned mission control for the Mars mission, along with the mock-up of the space vehicle.

The mock-up looked like a slightly larger Apollo capsule (four guys are going to live in that for over a year on a one-way trip? Sure they are...).

At the mission control, the guide said they were looking at a launch window around 2035. My question “So you’re telling me the astronauts for that mission are maybe in Kindergarten?” He looked annoyed and said “Yes.”

We aren’t going to Mars.


30 posted on 02/04/2016 5:33:18 PM PST by henkster (Hillary Clinton's supporters are beginning to realize they are fettered to a corpse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson