To a liberal, the only “intelligent conversation” is one where you accept their premises and paradigms — and most all where you agree with their conclusions.
I’d say. “Good. You won’t be missed. Until the shooting starts. Then you won’t be missed at all.”
On her 1st point, history is not revisionist when something gets left out. Most historic information is lost and the vast majority of what’s left and available is too much to consume. In my opinion, history is revisionist when falsehoods are injected into the body of material like: “sharks still concentrate in the seaways traveled by 18th Ce try slavers hopefully awaiting their next morsel”