She told 'em she turned everything over, she told them again and they just wouldn't let it go.
Gee I’d think that someone might want to discuss the fact that the wiping was about several felonies in and of itself.
It’s interesting how caviler media seems to be about that. How about a few articled demanding to know why a potential felon is being treated with kid gloves.
Hillary made a snarky comment about wiping the server with a cloth. Very funny Hillary.
Even if they couldn’t the mere fact of it is condemning.
Bad news for the Hildebeast.
She told 'em she turned everything over, she told them again and they just wouldn't let it go.
“I don’t get it.”
99% of her brain cells are dedicated to the task of accruing and maintaining power. The remaining 1% is reserved for ancillary tasks like deciding what to eat for dinner. No room left in there for mundane matters like electronic security.
In answer to the author’s question: piaps is clueless about computers. She handed it over to people based on their political loyalties, not their technical competence. And she might well burn for it.
Tomorrow, another branch of the FBI will say that the data was wiped in such a way that it can never be recovered.
not if it was DOD wiped.
Hillary Clinton’s ‘hacked’ Benghazi emails: FULL RELEASE
http://www.rt.com/usa/complete-emails-guccifer-clinton-554/
She claims that she turned over everything that wasn’t “personal”. I don’t believe it for a second.
Another key question: When, precisely, was the server wiped? PolitiFact addressed that question last month and the closest it came to an answer was sometime in the fall of 2014, after the State Department had asked her for her work-related correspondence and she sent them a batch of e-mails in reply. Is that true, or did she actually wipe it much later, perhaps after Trey Gowdy subpoenaed her in March demanding that she produce all correspondence related to the Benghazi attack?
If the answer is “after” then we have obstruction of justice in the form of destroying records to avoid compliance with a lawful demand. In fact, even if the answer is “before,” you could argue that we have obstruction of justice anyway. Law prof Ronald Rotunda made a compelling case back in March that if Hillary had reason to believe her e-mails might be subpoenaed eventually, then destroying them would make her guilty of anticipatory obstruction of justice.
In mass, the media hasn’t turned against her, and may not, but if they do, it will be really ugly.
I just look foreword to the day that Hillary is perp walked into the Courthouse for her arraignment on hundreds of counts of national security violations.
All I can say is She’d better be nice to Obama or she won’t get a Presidential Pardon.
She’s to old to take life in Prison.
I heard the server was installed in a bathroom, which gives der Hildebeast and out: She told the housekeeper to make sure the bathroom was well scrubbed.
Destroying electronic records to avoid producing them as evidence is called spoilation. It will really piss off a judge and it is not likely to succeed as there is never just one copy of an email. As an IT Director, I’ve seen my fair share of these requests. If you run a clean business, electronic records are typically exculpatory.
So they question now is: Will she go down kicking, screaming, crying, biting and spitting...or will she just kill herself?
