Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr
I got this in my mailbox today:

Which US States Would Survive As Independent Nations?

Of course it's tongue in cheek, but they go about it in precisely the wrong way, assuming that the richer (usually smaller, more populous, less military) states would be more likely to survive as independent countries than most of the poorer ones (they also appoint themselves as arbiters of a state's "likeability," which one has to be pretty arrogant to do).

My hunch is that states like Delaware, Connecticut, and Rhode Island wouldn't last long if some enemy wanted their resources and territory. While it's not likely that the reverse is true either (economic and educational resources do count for something in the world), it does look very wrong-headed.

Anyway, good for a laugh on a Saturday afternoon.

111 posted on 02/07/2015 10:54:31 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: x

It looks like they have about as strong a grasp of history and economics as our FRiend deo. LOL


112 posted on 02/07/2015 11:26:38 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson