“[I] verify the following:
1. A birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.”
No, gosh, I guess he didn't. He didn't verify no nuttin' about Obama being born in Hawaii.
What you claim and the words on Onaka's correspondence are much at odds.
If you look at the image of the 'verification' that has been posted, it clearly shows the initials of the person who stamped Onaka's name to the document.
An so long as Onaka authorized that person to sign and send the letter under his name, the law treats it as his act. It's call the "law of agency." I've not seen anything where Onaka has disavowed the three state verifications as being unauthorized. Have you?
Also, I'm still waiting for an reply to the post (#195) that clearly shows elements of the BC file released by the WH were copied and pasted from other elements on the file.
I already showed you where Ivan Zatkovich (who has bona fide credentials in this area) indicates that such doesn't not prove elements were added to the document. Unless you wish to establish your superior credentials in this matter, I'm going with him as the more credible witness.
With this, I'm done for the day here.
Yes, you should be done here with the nonsense you promulgate.
If there is no problem the BC would have been provided to Bennett. Instead he was made to amend his request, he was to refer to an internet image and ask that the information thereon be “verified”. This is a clever way to control the questions asked, and hence, to prevent disclosure of the whole truth.
The WHBC is not to be presented to any court or election official. Obama’s legal team has said it is not to be relied upon.
The WHBC, produced with fanfare, is nothing but a PR stunt.
>> With this, I’m done for the day here.
Too much for you, Red?
It might be nice if the owner of the initials doesn't board any single engine aircraft in the near future.
Personally I would recommend at least 4, just to be on the safe side.