Posted on 01/11/2013 4:44:07 AM PST by voicereason
On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court scheduled a birther case brought on by Orly Taitz which calls into question Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to be president of the United States. Dr. Taitz, a lawyer from Santa Margarita, Calif., also made the announcement on her website on Jan. 9. As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court's decision to review Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories. The case is identified as Edward Noonan, et al., v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State. On Feb. 15, all nine justices will hear arguments on whether Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief. Edward Noonan, et al., contend that if Obama had been ineligible to run in 2008, other Democratic candidates should have replaced him on the presidential ballot. Additionally, electoral votes from states such as California that went towards Obama should have been deemed null and void. Continued at source....
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Reberts?????
Well...........
THE
FIX
IS
IN!
Thanks for the “reality” perspective. It was truly needed.
The SCOTUS will not undo the will of the voters. Roberts has already made that clear in the ObamaCare decision.
In Roberts’ mind, an election can alter, amend or negate any or all of the US Constitution.
I like her as well, and admire her to sticking to principle even after so many failed hearings. I watched her presentation in Atlanta ... she is a terrible trial lawyer. Her presentation could have been bested by any high school student. She desperately needs to seek help in order to gain some trial skills.
That is the thing about blackmail - you can spend it, but then you still have it.
I am going to give away the blackmail on Roberts...
IMO, pictures on the internet show that he has had several gay relationships.
There, now everyone knows...
Roberts has been pwned since at least 2005 when the NYT went quiet after supposedly investigating his South American adoptions.
I’m wondering which other cases he’s mishandled.
something to pray for
None the less, I remain somewhat optimistic. We'll just have to wait and see how it plays out.
Interesting times...
The Alinsky tactic only works BECAUSE the “conservatives” mock the issue. Which is why Soros threatened the conservative media into first ignoring the issue (in October of 2008 and again within the first few months after the election) and later (when the issue could no longer be ignored) into mocking it. There’s documentation that threats have been made against anybody who would report credibly on Obama’s ineligibility. Mike Zullo of the Cold Case Posse confirmed to me that one of Doug Hagmann’s sources left the country in fear for her life.
The day that Arpaio had his first press conference, everybody was instead reporting on the death of Andrew Breitbart - who dropped dead to the ground less than 5 hours after calling Arpaio to ask about his evidence and telling Arpaio that his evidence was good (Breitbart had previously refused to report on the eligibility issue because he said the evidence was not good enough). The initial reports had Breitbart’s father-in-law saying he knew of no heart problems, and the coroner’s office (after having looked at his medical records) initially said he had not seen a doctor within the past year. Then the stories started changing, with colleagues claiming he had had a massive heart attack 6 months ago and had been in the hospital for 2 weeks. And yet the coroner’s report found no medicines within his system. The coroner’s office - in which one of the workers got violently sick the day before the Breitbart autopsy was due to come out, and died of what police suspected to be arsenic poisoning the actual day the autopsy came out - did not check for the only sign of a potassium chloride “assassination” dart - a small red entry hole that could appear anywhere on the body.
Also on the day of Arpaio’s first press conference, Rush Limbaugh received what his office treated as a bomb threat - a package alluding to 2 famous assassinations.
Limbaugh and Breitbart are the 2 voices either independent (Breitbart) or too large to be totally silenced by the (Clear Channel) company that had been threatened regarding Obama’s eligibility, and BOTH were hit on the day of Arpaio’s press conference - one with a package alluding to assassinations that shook him up, and the other with instant death.
Strangely enough (sarc), none of the “mainstream” media nor so-called “conservatives” reported on the evidence cited by Arpaio in his press conference announcing probable cause for forgery and the commencement of a criminal investigation of the issue.
2008 was literally a coup, complete with crimes - including the death threats and assassinations - that a coup requires.
Right now I have a criminal case against DNC Counsel Bob Bauer, who was informed by Attorney Larry Klayman (4 days before the DNC Convention began) that HI registrar Alvin Onaka had issued a certified verification to AZ SOS Ken Bennett in which he was required to verify any submitted birth fact that he can lawfully say was the way the event happened - and in which Onaka verified NONE of Obama’s birth facts. The only lawful reason for this to be the case is if the HI BC itself is not legally valid. Because there is no legally-valid HI BC, Obama has no legally-established birth facts and NOBODY can lawfully (without committing perjury and/or fraud) certify that he is qualified/eligible to be POTUS. Bauer ignored that and counseled Villagairosa and Germond to sign what Bauer knew to be a fraudulent/perjurious Official Certification of Nomination. That’s subornation of perjury. And Bauer submitted that perjurious OCON to almost every state SOS in order to get Obama’s name on the ballot. That’s election fraud. My criminal complaint accuses Bauer of subornation of perjury and of election fraud.
I informed the offices of every Republican member of Congress that every electoral vote Obama got is legally acknowledged as being the result of fraud. I informed them of Onaka’s disclosure that Obama’s HI BC is legally non-valid.
EVERY COTTON-PICKING SECRETARY either forwarded my fax to my 2 legislators (Rep Adrian Smith and/or Mike Johanns) or else threw it away. IOW, unless every state has somebody like me who works full-time on investigating this issue (while maintaining 2 part-time jobs and a family of 6), the other Congress-critters just have no choice but to be ignorant a$$holes.
I wonder if I had sent a fax notifying every Republican Congressman that there was going to be a bomb at the Capitol on Jan 6th, whether the fax would be taken seriously, or whether it would thrown out and/or forwarded to Smith and Johanns’ office since I am their constituent. I bet you they would scurry to defend their own fat a$$es. When it’s the whole country that is being held at knife-point, it’s not worth worrying about - pass the buck to 2 Congress-critters. And that is why I have no respect for ANY of them. None. They care about one thing and one thing only: themselves. Period.
The death of America is blood on their hands.
Yes, they are that stupid. That is why they follow Orly Taitz. Then again, I could almost see the Supreme Court taking the case for the sheer laugh-factor...the thought of Orly Taitz arguing a case in front of Scalia boggles the mind!
Are you people this naive, this stupid about Supreme Court procedures to believe there is anything significant about the mere conferencing of this case? Nearly every one of the thousands of petitions for certiorori (requests to the SCOTUS to hear a case) that are filed each year are “considered” by the nine justices at their weekly conference. At these conferences, the justices summarily reject the overwhelming vast majority of cases without discussion....
So how do the SC justices WHICH cases to consider? They must have some type of impact or weight on our legal system/constitution then to be considered.
Would you not consider a case dealing with the eligibility of the highest public office in the land to merit consideration over thousands of other cases?
I like your reasoning on this and pray your are correct.
Someone said on the other thread, it only takes four judges to decide to take the case. Even though this is probably a setup to deny Orly her petition, at least Orly made it all the way to the Supreme Court. Good for her.
I've never figured out why the so called conservative talk show hosts and newspapers dismissed the possibility that Obama has been hiding his real birth certificate, when there is plenty of evidence that he is doing just that.
>>and the SCOTUS agrees to hear only about 75 - 80 petitions (less that 1%) of the 10,000 it receives.<<
Do they all involve the pResident?
Unfortunately, they’ve shown time and time again that they do not consider this to be a matter worthy of their attention.
Now you know: threats. From people who have claimed the authority to assassinate US citizens without any accountability, who have long had the capability of making an assassination look like a heart attack, aneurysm, etc, and who now have access to the medical records of every person in this country.
And these people could have carried out that very thing in full view of everyone in the case of Andrew Breitbart just hours after he approved of Arpario’s evidence of forgery from the White House. The initial stories and coroner’s results don’t fit any of the stories we were later told, and the coroner’s office ended up not even checking for the methods of assassination that would have been employed.
I believe there are now 2 affidavits from witnesses who were told that Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs were each killed in succession within a couple weeks of the 2008 DNC Convention, when they each in turn agreed to present a petition at the Convention challenging Obama’s eligibility. Gwatney by a supposedly-random shooter who ended up killed by police, and Tubbs by an “aneurysm”. And ultimately Hillary herself did not present the petition because she and Bill were told that Chelsea would be killed if they did.
2008 was literally a coup.
My cut and paste didn't work correctly last time.
But the though is the same. No one really cares what you think.
If this judge takes the case and makes the correct patriotic judgement then they will be national heros for saving millions of peoples lives.
Because we are on the eve of the Second revolution, people are not willing to wait for the gun grabbers and are in superior numbers.
We have a superior numerical advantage.
And we are pissed.
Remove the usurper or America will have its Revolution.
You wrote: “Is this a shot across obama’s bow? If Obama is willing to violate the constitution and cause mass chaos with an executive order on gun control. The USSC can take him out on eligibility. They have been playing politics by not hearing the case. - to avoid chaos? Perhaps they see this as the easier choice now.”
For the record, I am a “Proud Birther” and have been since June 8, 2008 when the first forged “Certification of Live Birth” was presented by the Obama myrmidons.
I will be VERY surprised if the case goes to the full court for arguments. I pray it does.
Freepers, correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe the process here is that the Justices get a copy of the suit, read it and then “conference” and vote to bring it to the full Court for arguments. I have read previously that the “Rule of Four” for a “Writ of Certiorari” to bring it to the full Court is the requirement. That is, at least four Justices have to vote to hear the case in the full Court.
Two items to consider: 1. Justice Roberts has either been “bought” or is being blackmailed.
And, 2. The Supreme Court, I believe, will not go down the path of removing the first sitting black pResident.
The major cities would burn: Boston, New York City, Newark, Philly, Baltimore, DC, Atlanta, Miami, New Orleans, Detroit, Chicago, and LA, and on and on. Think about that. This is why I have always consider Obama to be THE current National Security Threat. We as a Nation are being held hostage by this Chicago Thug.
I, sadly, have been resigned to the fact that we have Obama for the duration.
And no one cares what Orly Taitz thinks, which is why this case won’t go anywhere. She’s a loon, and the justices are not going to vote to listen to her rantings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.