[CodeToad]

“Its called private property rights”

Funny, while you are on your highhorse about private proeprty rights you don’t seem to mention the person as private property and the rights of that property, such has the right to self defense and private concealment. What’s next, the right to search my wallet?

[JustSayNoToNannies]

What’s next, the right to search my wallet?

A property owner is within his natural rights to make your entry conditional on you submitting your wallet for inspection - and you are within your natural rights to decline those terms and not enter.

[ciaocotc]

Respect their private property rights but let them know very politely that you will not shop etc. there.

[Hot Tabasco]

Funny, while you are on your highhorse about private proeprty rights you don’t seem to mention the person as private property and the rights of that property, such has the right to self defense and private concealment. What’s next, the right to search my wallet?

Nothing funny about it. Any private property owner has the right to prevent firearms on their property, whether you like it or not.

And to answer your really stupid question, no, the private property owner has no right to search your wallet nor your personal body..........

It might help if you just stick to the issue of private property owners having the right to restrict firearms on their premises without bringing bogus arguments of wallets and body searches into the equation......Sheesh!

[familyop]

"Funny, while you are on your highhorse about private proeprty rights you don’t seem to mention the person as private property and the rights of that property, such has the right to self defense and private concealment."

There's the right to transport that person/property off of my property at my discretion. Any unwelcome person is a trespasser. Moreover, there's a "No Trespassing" sign at every (private) entrance several miles away in this case, so any uninvited person within several miles is a trespasser. Even my "highhorse" is secure. You've disregarded some pertinent and important constitutional rights.

[PAR35]

you don’t seem to mention the person as private property

You're a century and a half off. 'Persons' haven't been private property in this country since December 6, 1865.

[RayBob]

"Funny, while you are on your highhorse about private proeprty rights you don’t seem to mention the person as private property and the rights of that property, such has the right to self defense and private concealment. What’s next, the right to search my wallet?"

Obviously, you did not read my post. If you did, then you did not comprehend it. The owner of property has the legal right to prohibit others from bringing firearms on to his property. The gun owner, while he has a right to carry, does not have a right to bring his gun onto the private property of another where that property owner has given notice that firearms are not permitted on his property. How you jump to the "right to search my wallet" line, I can not figure out. As I stated in my post, the gun owner has the choice of either leaving his gun behind to enter that property or not enter it at all. If it is a business establishment, the proprietor is doing two things... he's turning away business and he's putting a big target on his back. As for getting down off my "high horse", I'll do that once you pull your head out of your behind.