You said Perry forbids hispanics from being taught in English. I showed you otherwise. You were wrong. You have admitted in your own post that they are taught in english.
Immigration Reform Act of 1996.
If you feel that Texas does not have the right to set its residency requirements for in-state tuition, then I suggest you file suit. Reading that pretty ambigious wording, I would hold that Texas is not breaking any law.
I’m pointing out that RICK PERRY is trying to have it both ways, being a champion of preventing eminent domain when it’s a border wall which is vital to our national interests, and there is a federal law expressly mandating it, then using eminent domain for a far larger project to enrich his Mexican puppet-masters.
Perry was dealing with roads within the State of Texas. Building 20,000 miles of wall is a federal issue. It's not going to happen. Putting a nonstop wall from Brownsville to Tijuana isn't going to happen either. Any candidate who claims they'll do it is blowing smoke up your ass. However, back to your claim, you stated that Perry would forbid Americans from driving on the tollway. That is false. Again, you're bitching about eminent domain within Texas, then calling for eminent along the border. I must ask you. Do you want all 20,000 miles of border covered, or is it you just don't want Mexicans coming here?. Do you want to wall off Alaska and northern America from the Candians and Iranians who can travel there? Do you want to wall off Hawaii from the Japanese? Do you want to wall off Florida from the Cubans?
Actually, businesses all over Texas are using it. But the Texas government won’t.
I would suggest you convince your Texas Representative and Senator to change the law, if you think that the State of Texas should use it. If you don't want to go that route, I would suggest you get the issue on the ballot to change the Texas Constitution.
>> I just re-read your in-state tuition screed. To qualify for in-state tuition rates one must live in-state, so I’m not sure how your argument applies <<
Like hell you did. You made an unsubstantiated claim; I answered with an official government report.
>> If you feel that Texas does not have the right to set its residency requirements for in-state tuition, then I suggest you file suit. <<
Unfortunately, that’s up to the Obama administration and the Bush administration before them. Private citizens lack standing.
>> Perry was dealing with roads within the State of Texas. <<
Actually, no. He was using Texas to provide access to middle America. Texans weren’t going to be allowed to use the highway.
>> Building 20,000 miles of wall is a federal issue. It’s not going to happen. <<
20,000 miles of wall? Interesting to see your geography knowledge is as utterly lacking as your common sense, legal understanding, logic and political knowledge. LOL! 20,000 miles of wall is not going to happen; that’s for sure! Hey, by the way, a coyote freeway is also a federal issue.
>> Again, you’re bitching about eminent domain within Texas, then calling for eminent along the border. <<
I’m pointing out Perry’s contradiction. But yes, protecting our borders from hostile invasion is a legitimate function; building a highway to make it easier for coyotes and coke dealers is not.
>> Do you want all 20,000 miles of border covered, or is it you just don’t want Mexicans coming here?. Do you want to wall off Alaska and northern America from the Candians and Iranians who can travel there? Do you want to wall off Hawaii from the Japanese? Do you want to wall off Florida from the Cubans? <<
When we get 20 million Canadians pouring over the border, I might consider the wisdom of a Northern wall. Until then, you’re an idiot.