There you go again with not wanting to make a judgment...now you're sounding like those two jurors whos said the same thing....perhaps you are simply unaware it's a matter of record they did not ask nor review any of the over 300 pieces of evidence.
how they felt about the case.
How they felt does not play into the equation of reviewing the evidence...and they were told that. But they did not review the evidence...not one single piece and that is reflective, and evidences, their lack of critical thinking..or that they even attempted such.
jurors who have spoken.. their hands were tied
Well they have to blame someone...in order to get the monkees off their backs. The ball was in their court...as you said .."The deciders".........Trying to wiggle out that that they did just that now is like trying to determine 'who put the tape on Caley's face.' Who do they think they're kidding....the judgement was theirs to make...what mattered to them was taking the easy way out because they lacked the skills to do this right...... Not guilty on 'all counts' except lying....says volumes.
That’s right. There were 12 jurors tasked with that job. They were strictly controlled on what testimony they saw and what information they were not allowed to see. They were then told to make a decision under a set of laws and rules told to them by a judge and I wasn’t there.
I believe it’s unfair to judge what they did because we were not in their shoes. I do believe the investigators and prosecution did a lousy job.
The constitution has set the guidelines and while it’s not perfect it seems to be the best there has ever been.