[Dixie Yooper]

But now that we’re talking about it, how much of this case did YOU follow?

I listened to Mark Levin's commentary on it the evening the verdict was read. He based his presentation on all the admissible facts the jury worked with as soon as he heard they were in deliberation. No Nancy Grace. No "No Spin Zone". No nightly news with (talking head's name here). And no talk shows with so called experts telling me what's going on, other than Mark Levin on the only night he covered any of it. He has renamed his show since as "The Casey Anthony News Free Zone".

[MizSterious]

But did he by any chance mention that one of the charges was child abuse/neglect? They found her not guilty of that charge. Yet (repeating myself yet again) THE CHILD WAS MISSING FOR THIRTY-ONE DAYS, AND THE MOTHER NEVER--NEVER--REPORTED HER MISSING. (The grandmother did after 31 days.) How was she "not guilty" of child abuse and/or neglect?

You and others make a big deal about people watching Nasty Grace and other shows--yet I see you are guilty of taking your opinion from a radio show. Snort. Levin, like all the others mentioned here, is a talk show host.

[Bluebird Singing]

For what it’s worth, I heard that Levin show and I heard Levin misstate evidence presented by the prosecutors.

I lost respect for him, and would not base my opinion of this trial on what Mark Levin says. I expected more from someone of his caliber.