Posted on 04/27/2011 5:22:49 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
Ok, so there it is just waiting for a subpena, Obama's "long form" birth certificate. For the past two years his legal team has been in one courtroom after another insisting that no one had "standing" to demand a look. He himself, this morning on world-wide television just erased this argument from his legal repertoire. What possible excuse could he present in order to keep this document out of a courtroom discussion when he released a photocopy of it himself, to everyone?
Let the researchers come forth with their proof of fraud and may justice be served. It's time to consider what legal challenges to make and which avenue is best suited to pursue. The clock is ticking on this criminal fraud and the "Bagdad Bob" MSM who are doing their level best to cover for him. tick...tick....tick....
Wrong, no physician. No footprint. No US Citizen parents. No President!
Here is the smoking gun link http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
What do you figure caused the white halos around all the printing. The white is clearly not inside the shape of the letters but it eliminates the pattern which is the "security background".
If somebody attempted to present me with a check that had a security background with that effect, I would refuse the check. The whole purpose of the background is to make it plain when somebody attempts to change the lettering. This document displays the very characteristics which would make a person doubt it authenticity.
Oh, got it....thanks!
No problem! :-)
is that you, hummblegunner-
look, tammy wynnette is singing your song too
TXE is inserted as a security feature for validation? /s
RC, I'm afraid that you are under the mistaken impression that I am G-d. I would like it stated plainly for the record that I am not, nor have I ever been, a deity.
And you bring to the top yet one of the many, many things that still has me bothered by this whole mess. :-)
It wasn’t printed on the green paper, the WH added that with Adobe after the fact. Guess somebody thought it looked more realer that way.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2011-04-27-obama-birth-certificate_n.htm?csp=34news
My BC and my husband's are the microfiche type that you're talking about. But my daughter's (19 years old) is done like the one presented here. (Copied onto security paper) She was born in Wyoming. Her's does have a raised seal, though.
No equal justice under the law. 0bama is above the law.
What is the actual evidence that when the question was brought into various courts, Obama's lawyers asked the cases be dismissed for lack of standing? Did Perkins Coie ever actually go into court in these cases? If so, where, and when?
What explains the white coloring surrounding the printing which interferes with the background pattern? Was there a printer used capable of printing white space? The whole idea of using a security background is that it makes it very difficult to modify text without being able to see that the security background is affected wherever the original printing has been deleted.
There are white halos around virtually all of the printing. What explains this? How did a scanner or printer create white where there should be green security background?
******
If the certificate was in a bound book, could you explain how the original long form birth certificate was attached in the book?
What is the documemt that is next to it?
Why isn't the certificate a free standing document?
Certificate Back: Is there anything on the back? Thanks.
I’m tickled you are confusing me with humblegunner, but I think real Texans could tell us apart.
“I thought you said the COLB was the legit document.”
I was correct. This certified copy of the original Certificate of Live Birth document confirms the data in the COLB. 100% agreement.
But of course. (m)essiah must be accommodated.
Was it printed with a black toner or black ink printer? Are there any signs on your document of the white halos surrounding all the printing on Obama's newest offering?
Or is it obvious that your document consists of the security paper background with only black features added so that if you attempted to change the printing, the security background would be incomplete around any modified text?
The security background is definitely incomplete practically throughout Obama's document.
“Actually I would have thought the original document would exist on microfiche or microfilm and be printed from that medium “
Nope. Everything in the past 10 years has been digitized. A lot more efficient than the microfiche.
“When I got a copy of my husband’s original BC (NY) it came as a negative copy on regular paper which they affixed a stamp and signed it to authenticate it.”
That was probably some time ago. prior to 2000?
“why print on the patterned paper? “
SEcurity paper, to indicate its an official paper from this office.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.