Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TCA: TLC Orders Polygamist Reality Show 'Sister Wives'
Broadcasting & Cable ^ | 8/6/2010 | Stephanie Robbins

Posted on 08/06/2010 5:42:51 PM PDT by MizSterious

TCA: TLC Orders Polygamist Reality Show 'Sister Wives'

Seven-part series explores day-to-day life of Utah man, his three wives and 13 children

By Stephanie Robbins -- Broadcasting & Cable, 8/6/2010 12:20:02 PM

TLC has ordered a seven-part polygamist reality series Sister Wives, the network announced Friday during the Discovery Communications portion of the TCA press tour.

Each half-hour episode follows Kody Brown and his three -- soon to be four -- wives and their combine 13 children living day-to-day life in Utah.

Peter Liguori, COO of Discovery Communicatoions, opened the Discovery portion and addresed the controversial nature of the new series.

(Excerpt) Read more at broadcastingcable.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; polygamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/06/2010 5:42:54 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pebcak

FYI


2 posted on 08/06/2010 5:43:47 PM PDT by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Well, if you can’t limit marriage to a man and a woman, what right do we have to limit it to just two people?


3 posted on 08/06/2010 5:48:09 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Truman: The buck stops here. Obama: Buck? What buck? Did I tell you how it's all Bush's fault?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

I’m sure you’ll find plenty who will agree—but I’m not one of them. Two (or more) wrongs don’t make a right.


4 posted on 08/06/2010 5:52:30 PM PDT by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

If they are not legally married, then the law doesn’t care


5 posted on 08/06/2010 5:55:18 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

fyi ping


6 posted on 08/06/2010 6:21:41 PM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; markomalley; 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


7 posted on 08/06/2010 6:24:55 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Oh that’s next...multiple husbands/wives/legally marrying next of kin/probably some loon will want to marry his/her dog (at least that might be prohibited, the dog can’t sign the marriage license).


8 posted on 08/06/2010 6:26:48 PM PDT by GatorGirl (Eschew Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I guess from the point of view of the law, this guy is married to one or fewer of these women, and is committing adultery with those he is not married to?


9 posted on 08/06/2010 6:28:53 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ('“Our own government has become our enemy' - Sheriff Paul Babeu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Be reasonable, Lucius.

The only way to escape the "two wives --> two mothers-in-law" quicksand *is* to marry sisters. /sarc>

BTW, a blast from the past:

Father of Thirty Says “Give Me a Break” (Belgium's Welfare Superior To Anyone's)

Cheers!

10 posted on 08/06/2010 6:54:23 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl
Oh that’s next...multiple husbands/wives/legally marrying next of kin/probably some loon will want to marry his/her dog (at least that might be prohibited, the dog can’t sign the marriage license).

Now, don't be a bigot! The dog can provide a paw print and a little bit of drool for the marriage license.

11 posted on 08/06/2010 7:07:54 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I don’t have TV so I’ve never seen a reality show but from what I’ve read they sound utterly degrading. And getting more so.


12 posted on 08/06/2010 7:17:12 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Our society is doomed.


13 posted on 08/07/2010 5:26:57 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

I’m just saying from a practical standpoint, once we’ve crossed one bridge (the idea that marriage is between one man and one woman), why on earth do we think it’ll stop at a man and a man and a woman and a woman? What is to stop several people of each gender “marrying” each other? Not saying that I agree with what’s going on, but that slope is awfully slick...


14 posted on 08/07/2010 8:51:00 AM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Truman: The buck stops here. Obama: Buck? What buck? Did I tell you how it's all Bush's fault?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

Why on God’s earth would any guy want more than ONE wife anyway? :) You have enough to deal with one.
Signed,
A long time happily divorced male


15 posted on 08/07/2010 9:14:08 AM PDT by Phinanceguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper
What is to stop several people of each gender “marrying” each other? Not saying that I agree with what’s going on, but that slope is awfully slick...

There's nothing new about that concept.

About 20 years ago, during a lull in a military exercise, I skimmed through a coworker's Star Trek novel. There was a reference to contractual agreements among groups of officers to form a "communal family" with open sexual relationships. The members of this "family would take turns using their vacation time to care for the children.

It sounded a lot like the "Hippy Communes" of the 60s and 70s, except with paying jobs.

16 posted on 08/07/2010 9:42:10 AM PDT by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
There's nothing new about that concept.

The idea and practice of tribal wives is still being practiced in parts of Africa.
17 posted on 08/07/2010 9:43:52 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Why not go to the Middle East? The polygamists there are open about it, it’s not an underground movement there. Muslims are also the most likely to bring the case to court. It’s legitimate in African/Middle Eastern nations, and it’s only a matter of time before a polygamous immigrant, whose past culture and government allowed it, to end up here in the U.S.


18 posted on 08/08/2010 6:04:29 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

If they are not legally married, the law doesn’t care.

True, but are you certain they will never make a move to legalize or gain recognition? Again, that’s a legitimate reason to keep one’s eyes open about the matter? A number of campaigns have pushed for us to both approve and fund their way of living. We don’t need any of it. The last thing I want to say is “I told you so” when someone who lives polygamously asks for legal recognition of the plural marriages he has taken on.


19 posted on 08/08/2010 6:11:20 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Phinanceguy

Men have had no problem funding mistresses and spending nights in the mistress’ home while married to another woman. The fact that a guy would want more than one wife anyway isn’t far from the man who routinely cheats his “one wife” with other women, or casually divorces and marries a series of wives (Hollywood marriages). The only real difference is that one makes a marital commitment to all of these women, while the other two cases a man tries to call himself monogamous by the letter of the law, when he is not truly monogamous.


20 posted on 08/08/2010 6:16:56 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson