[Dr. Eckleburg]

Part of the problem is that according to the Vatican's Crimen Sollicitationis the victim and his family are sworn to secrecy from the time of the abuse until 10 years after the victim reaches the age of 18 upon threat of excommunication.

That threat explains a lot of lag time.

[RegulatorCountry]

You've been debated vehemently and repeatedly on this point, Dr. Eckleberg.

Could you please post the relevant text from this Crimen Sollicitationis in order to gauge the accuracy of what you claim?

I don't mean to sound as if I'm challenging you. I just want to nip an other endless round of recriminations in the bud. If it's there in black and white, then it's there. If it's not, it's not.

[vladimir998]

Incredibly, you posted again, this:

“Part of the problem is that according to the Vatican’s Crimen Sollicitationis the victim and his family are sworn to secrecy from the time of the abuse until 10 years after the victim reaches the age of 18 upon threat of excommunication.”

I asked you to prove this before. Will you do it now? Or will you run from another thread?

[theanonymouslurker]

Part of the problem is that according to the Vatican's Crimen Sollicitationis the victim and his family are sworn to secrecy from the time of the abuse until 10 years after the victim reaches the age of 18 upon threat of excommunication.

LOL. You just post this garbage over and over and over and over....

[Natural Law]

"Part of the problem is that according to the Vatican's Crimen Sollicitationis the victim and his family are sworn to secrecy from the time of the abuse until 10 years after the victim reaches the age of 18 upon threat of excommunication."

Don't you ever get tired of spreading that same lie across dozens of threrads?

[mockingbyrd]

Dude...that’s just bogus. Flat out bogus. And silly. And it’s pretty silly to think that it could even be true.

So, maybe you should stop repeating it.