Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Oh come on Dr, you’re smarter than this. Paragraph 11 is CLEARLY talking about how priest are forbidden to reveal anything said in the confessional, ever. But, should the need arise is the course of a trial, this penalty is lifted ONLY during the trial. The priest is not allowed to comment on what was said in the confessional before or after said proceeding. And did you even READ paragraph 13? It says that the accusers are especially free of subjection of censure, unless related to a different matter.

Like I said, totally bogus. And since you maintain that you read Crimen Sallicitationis, you know that you are spouting bogus nonsense.


35 posted on 04/12/2010 10:14:01 PM PDT by mockingbyrd (Remember in November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: mockingbyrd
We've heard the same excuses for a long while now. Black is white. Up is down. The written word doesn't say what it says. The written word means something completely different.

"Flee from idolatry."

39 posted on 04/12/2010 10:17:42 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson