Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition

Interesting. But without context, specifically the staffs of previous first ladies, it’s meaningless.


2 posted on 01/06/2010 3:36:29 PM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Melas

Laura Bush had almost the exact same size staff.


3 posted on 01/06/2010 3:39:13 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Melas

July 31, 2009

By MB Snow

There has been some discussion of Michelle Obama’s staff payroll compared to Laura Bush’s. Here are the results of my investigation.

Michelle Obama has 16 paid staff which cost the American taxpayers $1,256,700.

Laura Bush had 10 paid staff which cost the American taxpayers $764,900.

A difference of $491,800.

This was in August. Looks like the staff increased by 10 since then. So my guess is we’re probably looking at a $1,000,000 difference in salaries.


4 posted on 01/06/2010 3:40:13 PM PST by Right Cal Gal (Ronald Reagan: "our liberal friends....know so much that isn't so...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Melas

Is it easier to pontificate or use a net search?

Here, I’ll do it for ya ....Laura Bush had 10 paid staff which cost the American taxpayers $764,900....for starters.


5 posted on 01/06/2010 3:42:55 PM PST by Daffynition (What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson