To: SunkenCiv; neverdem; SuperLuminal; lepton; The_Reader_David; snarks_when_bored; Physicist; ...
Like, *PING*, dudes.
...oh, and Happy Easter. Countdown to Guinness and chocolate ACCELERATES.
Cheers!
2 posted on
04/11/2009 9:40:15 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: grey_whiskers
Happy Easter
4 posted on
04/11/2009 11:11:16 PM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: grey_whiskers; LibWhacker
As I've said before, I continue to subscribe to the Roseanne Roseanna-Danna Theory of Everything:
To: grey_whiskers
"
"...only replaces one design problem with another, strengthening the evidence of god. “It seems that any multiverse model which can explain our observable universe requires a beginning and still exhibits design..." Seems perfectly reasonable to me.
But then......what about the new American emperor and consort? How do we ever explain them under a multiverse-driven "fine-tuning" strategy?
Is there some way they can be shoved back through a bubble to their point of origin?
9 posted on
04/12/2009 12:20:15 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: grey_whiskers; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
Thanks grey_whiskers.
· Google ·
11 posted on
04/12/2009 3:19:49 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson