Skip to comments.
What is the story behind this picture? [vanity]
n/a
| n/a
| none
Posted on 12/18/2008 8:24:00 AM PST by Carlucci
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: Carlucci
I'd have tried to see the back of the picture.........
Did you look?
21
posted on
12/18/2008 8:38:29 AM PST
by
Osage Orange
(Congress would steal the nickels off a dead man's eye's...............)
To: Smokin' Joe
To high up to be the SOL........
22
posted on
12/18/2008 8:39:35 AM PST
by
Osage Orange
(Congress would steal the nickels off a dead man's eye's...............)
To: wildbill
“Id have to say it must be from one of those dirigibles like the Hindenberg that took passengers, but damn thats a dangerous looking outside platform for passengers.’
Yea, can't believe a safety conscious airship like the HINDEBERG, would do that.
23
posted on
12/18/2008 8:39:52 AM PST
by
dblshot
To: Carlucci
It's obviously a composite.
Look at the composition of the observation deck...heavy metal, possibly of a nautical sort. And given that she is at a height many times greater than the WTC, her hair and clothing are barely blowing in the wind.
To: Carlucci
NY overshot:
25
posted on
12/18/2008 8:41:08 AM PST
by
IrishPennant
(Patriotism is strongest when accompanied by bad politics, loyal FRiends and great whiskey)
To: IrishPennant
Frm almost 4,400 feet up, btw
26
posted on
12/18/2008 8:42:33 AM PST
by
IrishPennant
(Patriotism is strongest when accompanied by bad politics, loyal FRiends and great whiskey)
To: justlurking
Most all of the other pictures were of New York in the 40’s, 50’s and 60’s.
There was a pic of Marilyn Monroe with Joe Dimaggio, I think. One of Marilyn by herself. Another of Times Square. That pic with all the men/women in formal attire in a theater wearing 3-D glasses was there. One of Yankee Stadium. All of them were decidedly non-freaky, and then there was this one. All were in Black-and-White.
I didn’t ask the management of D&B for any info, because I seriously doubt they would have had anything to offer, other than a shrug and “It was here when I started working here.”
27
posted on
12/18/2008 8:43:15 AM PST
by
Carlucci
To: Carlucci
I seem to remember that a scale model of NYC was built for one of the world fairs. There were elevated platforms that were built to allow people to view the model.
28
posted on
12/18/2008 8:44:53 AM PST
by
Andyman
(The truth shall make you FReep.)
To: Charles Henrickson
Can one of you guys put Tourist Guy next to her? Darned good idea
29
posted on
12/18/2008 8:45:06 AM PST
by
IrishPennant
(Patriotism is strongest when accompanied by bad politics, loyal FRiends and great whiskey)
To: Carlucci
Probably a dirigible. If the dirigible was traveling at the speed of the wind, her hair would be still.
If she were in a fixed position, her hair would be blowing around, a good indication that it was a dirigible.
Not a composite at all, just a very good historical photograph.
That would be such a cool way to travel. You could spend the whole trip on the observation platform sipping mint julips.
To: Andyman; Carlucci
I seem to remember that a scale model of NYC was built for one of the world fairs. There were elevated platforms that were built to allow people to view the model. There's a large aerial photograph of Washington, DC, in the National Air and Space Museum, partially laid out on the floor. It's part of an exhibit about spy satellites and aerial reconnaissance.
There's no viewing platform above it -- the most you can do is stand next to it. But, maybe there's something similar of NYC somewhere?
31
posted on
12/18/2008 8:50:45 AM PST
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
To: Carlucci
I think she is standing over the diorama that is at the Queens Hall of Science, which was part of the Worlds Fair.
32
posted on
12/18/2008 8:51:50 AM PST
by
gridlock
(QUESTION AUTHORITY)
To: justlurking; mikrofon; martin_fierro
There's a large aerial photograph of Washington, DC, in the National Air and Space Museum. . . . Shouldn't the Air and Space Museum be empty?
To: texmexis best
Not a composite at all, just a very good historical photograph. I'm not aware of any dirigibles with an exterior catwalk that have been flying since the World Trade Center was built.
34
posted on
12/18/2008 8:52:56 AM PST
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
To: BenLurkin
35
posted on
12/18/2008 8:53:32 AM PST
by
usmcobra
To: Carlucci
This pic of NYC was taken sometime between 1971 and 2001 (the twin towers are visible). It appears to be a shot taken from a jet passing over the City at between 25,000 and 35,000 feet (I made a comparison using Google Earth).
To: gridlock
37
posted on
12/18/2008 8:54:31 AM PST
by
gridlock
(QUESTION AUTHORITY)
To: Andyman
Still on view at the Queens Museum when last I checked. They keep it updated with building changes.
But the fuzziness on this pic indicates distance — pics of this model would be sharp and close.
38
posted on
12/18/2008 8:55:11 AM PST
by
Norman Conquest
(My old man taught me two things: Mind own business, and always cut cards.)
To: nodumbblonde
39
posted on
12/18/2008 8:55:38 AM PST
by
nodumbblonde
(Apologies: Due to the coming economic crisis, I've had to let my tagline go.)
To: Charles Henrickson
40
posted on
12/18/2008 8:57:17 AM PST
by
Blogger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson