[allmendream]

The article is written by Creationists for Creationists and for only one reason, because guilt by association is all the standing they have, and even then it is a double edged sword, seeings as how Hitler also talked about killing Jews to avenge the “blood upon the cross”; of course one wouldn't expect that salient fact to be mentioned, as AiG is engaged in apologetics propaganda, and not an unimpassioned essay on the evidence.

[tpanther]

The article is written by Creationists for Creationists and for only one reason, because guilt by association is all the standing they have, and even then it is a double edged sword, seeings as how Hitler also talked about killing Jews to avenge the “blood upon the cross”; of course one wouldn't expect that salient fact to be mentioned, as AiG is engaged in apologetics propaganda, and not an unimpassioned essay on the evidence.

This from the side constantly making comparisons between creation scientists and militant Islam.

Liberals simply can not deal with their own tactics.

[CottShop]

[[The article is written by Creationists for Creationists and for only one reason, because guilt by association is all the standing they have,]]

lol- I just popped into htis thread and read this comment- please tell me you didn’t jjust say that? Still laughing- Acording to soem in htis thread- ID is dismantled by tryign to associate it with Creationism- ID is dismantled by trying to associate it with the OPINIONS of some scientists in the field OUTSIDE of the actual science- and ID is dissaembled by tryign to associate it with a few websites who have soem particular statements of faith-

You folks are really precious- Honest- If nothign else- you all is consistently hypocritical