[Non-Sequitur]

Why is it, NS, that the Kingdom isn’t responding to say that Obama’s birth legend as he claims it MATCHES those original birth certificates?

The state of Hawaii has stated for the record that it has Obama's birth certificate on file. What more do you want them to do?

[bvw]

NS, were my words "to say that Obama’s birth legend as he claims it MATCHES those original birth certificates?" too obtuse for you? That may be. I'll restate:

Since Obama has produced what he claims to be an official document from Hawaii, and that document -- the COLB -- lists a certain set of facts, therefore those alleged facts are now publicly known, and publicly known since Obama chose to make them known, and since he, himself, did make them known.

Thus there's no claim to privacy on those facts.

Now we understand that the Hawaiian officials are bound by law not to release the actual state records of Obama's birth unless he okays it.

But they could say that (1) the alleged facts of his birth that Obama claims via the alleged official COLB match that which are in their records. They did not.

And they could day that (2) the alleged COLB that Obama has shown us is the same form that they issued. They did not.

What did they say? They said that there is some copy of some original birth records for Obama that are held by the state.

What did they say by glaring ommission? What is the reasonable inference? That the COLB Obama has presented publicly is NOT accurate.

[itsahoot]

The state of Hawaii has stated for the record that it has Obama's birth certificate on file. What more do you want them to do?

Well they could produce it, after all Ohio had no trouble releasing confidential state records on Joe the Plumber.

[null and void]

The state of Hawaii has stated for the record that it has Obama's birth certificate on file. What more do you want them to do?

See post #465...

Oh and one more thing, Chiyome Fukino is not the state of Hawai'i. She is only any employee of the state. And human.