[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

Don't argue with me about it--I already said I'm no physicist, at least not at any level capable of defending big bang theory. That particular sub-theory seems to be one from 1973 that never led to much, so I'm certainly not going to push it.

I did find another quote from a physicist to the effect that "The reason that there is Something rather than Nothing is that Nothing is unstable." Cool, huh?

[AndrewC]

Don't argue with me about it

Okay. But you posted on a subject that interests me. There are aspects of the theory that are "just so", but lots of "neat" stuff supported by physics that we can test now.