If a second plane hadn’t flown into the NYC buildings on 9/11, they would have immediately dismissed that one, too. Hard to do when it’s two. They also immediately declared the shoe bomber wasn’t a terrorist, too—but that one didn’t fly either.
Which is why I have this little checklist I use when viewing or listening to the reports: 1. Did they immediately declare “not terrorism” without investigating? 2. Did they refrain from using the name and/or picture of the perp(s)? 3. On a scale of 1-10, how ridiculous is the official explanation of the event?
Good point!
Yep....probably much more to the story and by the time it comes out that the guy’s name had an ‘islamic’ ring to it or AQ literature, etc. was found in the room....no-one will be paying attention anymore.