Last week it was reported several times that Baird could not be there for court on Tuesday 4/3. (this was on the same day Stern actually filed his appeal)
I don’t know why they would actually need Baird - why not send another expert from the same lab to be in court today?
They had the expert testify before the swabs were taken. The tests are probably notarized and signed off each step of the way...What more do they need?
They could just call Baird up, and have him confirm the findings "via live teleconference".
We'll know in two hours :)
sw