“...severe consequences put in place to prevent anyone from repeating such diktats to force chemical rape, why go back under their control?”
The world lived in by the military member is not the same as the civilian world. It’s a world based upon discipline and like thinking for the level that you work.
The people being put back in did not get discharged because they refused to take the vaccine. They were discharged because they chose to disobey a direct order in defiance of the UCMJ. The military didn’t care what they were refusing to do, just they were refusing to do something they were ordered to do.
At that time the main refusal was based upon saying there was human DNA in the vaccines which hadn’t been used for injections since 1985. It wasn’t there. So that reasoning wasn’t valid. And the three identified reactions from the vaccines were anaphylaxis, which can happen with a allergy shot, and myocarditis and pericarditis which are very rare and can be corrected with medication.
So by saying the members were discharged because they refused to take the vaccines, is not the truth. It is a way to spectacularize a story. They refused an order and were not granted the opportunity of relief from it. And the military is a different world that runs differently than the civilian world. If the government is going to rescend an order, then that’s one thing. If they are going to rescend an order based upon something other than the truth, that isn’t right.
wy69
Nice bs post. An experimental vax which history has shown to be crap. Blanket dismissal of pleas of conscience. They got boned. See you @ Nuremburg.
A reply to this post of yours is in order. In 1991, I was FORCED to take an experimental vaccine. I then had gotten severely sick and I still suffer some issues today from it (found out years later it was the Anthrax vax).
Many service people had major reactions and I am of the firm belief this is the root cause of Gulf War Syndrome. In 1995 the Army had to recind their use, due to a law suit, without full consent of the person.
No one. Even US military should NEVER become human guinea pigs. Like another poster said to you...Nuremberg!
It's the opposite - the illegal diktat was given in violation of the UCMJ but none of those who gave it or enforced it have been charged.
I was in the military and saw unlawful orders called out and refused more often than civilians would believe. Some blew up in the face of the offender at the squadron level. Some went all the way up and ended O-6s careers.
Then why weren't they court-martialed?