😂😂😂😂
🤡
(Mc) 🍈
😂😂😂😂
🤡
🍈
😂😂😂😂
🤡
Posted on 02/24/2024 5:59:01 AM PST by SpeedyInTexas
This list only includes destroyed vehicles and equipment of which photo or videographic evidence is available. Therefore, the amount of equipment destroyed is significantly higher than recorded here. Loitering munitions, drones used as unmanned bait, civilian vehicles and derelict equipment are not included in this list. All possible effort has gone into avoiding duplicate entries and discerning the status of equipment between captured or abandoned. Many of the entries listed as 'abandoned' will likely end up captured or destroyed. Similarly, some of the captured equipment might be destroyed if it can't be recovered. When a vehicle is captured and then lost in service with its new owners, it is only added as a loss of the original operator to avoid double listings. When the origin of a piece of equipment can't be established, it's not included in the list. The Soviet flag is used when the equipment in question was produced prior to 1991. This list is constantly updated as additional footage becomes available.
(Excerpt) Read more at oryxspioenkop.com ...
😂😂😂😂
🤡
(Mc) 🍈
😂😂😂😂
🤡
🍈
😂😂😂😂
🤡
https://bsky.app/profile/militarynewsua.bsky.social/post/3m5isdbrbgc2d
On the 19th September 2025 between 0958 and 1011hrs Russia carried out another, in a series of air incursions into Estonian airspace. They were technically minor infractions but the last one lasted almost 12 minutes, and in the context of tensions with NATO – largely created by Russia itself, it was just another dangerous move in the never ending game of Baltic chess.
The F-35’s closed from behind – unseen – and identified the aircraft using their optical scanner before pulling away. The Gripens commander then used the emergency radio frequency to tell the Russians, “You are under our control. Return to Russian air space immediately”.
At first confused the Russian pilots turned one after another and departed Estonian air space, back into international space and continued their journey to Kaliningrad. Who would like to have been in the briefing room after that escapade?
@aegrotattoo9018
1 hour ago
Ukraine was always the ‘Rheinmetall’ of the Soviet Union, the brains of the whole mess. These are big shoes they’ve always worn.
KABOOM! Novorossiysk on fire.
Kyiv Independent (14 Nov):
Russian oil terminal in Novorossiysk on fire following reported Ukrainian drone strikes
“Ukrainian drones struck the Russian port city of Novorossiysk on Nov. 14, damaging an oil terminal and sparking a large fire, multiple Russian Telegram channels reported.
The attack hit the Sheskharis oil complex, where infrastructure facilities were damaged and a blaze broke out.
The facility is a major oil export terminal that serves as the endpoint for pipelines run by Russia’s state-run Transneft, the world’s largest oil pipeline company.
Russian state media RIA Novosti also resported that a civilian vessel in the port was also hit during the mass UAV strike, leaving three crew members injured.“
Wikipedia, on the oil terminal just struck in Novorossissyk:
“The united complex of Sheskharis and Grushevaya Balka oil terminals became the largest in Europe and the most efficient in USSR… In 2012 Sheckharis and Grushevaya merged into united enterprise ‘Sheskharis oil terminal’.
By 2012 Sheskharis oil terminal accounted for more than 30% of Russian oil export. The terminal has 3 docks of 200 meters total length.
Berth No.1 is the deepest, it can handle vessels with deadweight up to 250,000 tons and 19-meters draft, it transfers only oil cargo with 10,000 tons per hour capacity.
Berth No.2 is 14.5 meters deep, it can take vessels up to 90,000 deadweight and 13.9 m draft, its capacity range from 90 up to 6,000 tons per hour.
Berth No.3 accepts ships up to 33,000 DWT, draft alongside is 10.9 m, it processes mainly naphtha residue and diesel (800—900) tons per hour.
Berth No.4 serves bunkering vessels up to 3.6 DWT. Berths No.5 and No.8 transfer oil derivatives and accept tankers up to 12,000 tons DWT.
Berths No.6 and No.7 are able to take tankers up to 65,000 tons DWT, draft alongside is 13 m. Sheskharis oil terminal can simultaneously process 7 tankers.”
Oil markets react in the short term to strikes on Russian oil infrastructure, especially the four big Western export terminals for Urals grade crude (Novorossiysk, Tuapse, Ust Luga and Primorsk) - but fundamentally, enough replacement supply is available on the market. Prices will rise as Russia’s oil infrastructure get’s destroyed, but they won’t go crazy high - because President Trump has masterfully prepared the battlefield.
OilPrice.com (Nov 13, 2025):
Oil Prices Jump as Ukraine Hits One of Russia’s Biggest Export Hubs
“Oil prices climbed in early Asian trade on Friday as markets responded to renewed attacks by Ukraine against energy infrastructure in Russia. A Ukrainian drone attack on the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossiysk, one of the country’s most important oil export hubs, triggered renewed fears of supply disruptions in what has been a very bearish market of late.
At the time of writing, WTI had risen 1.52% to $59.58 while Brent was trading at $63.88.
The attacks damaged a ship, nearby apartment buildings, and an oil depot, injuring three crew members aboard the vessel, Russian regional authorities confirmed.
Ukrainian forces have increasingly targeted Russian oil-refining, storage, and export infrastructure using drones and missiles. The campaign has gained intensity in recent months, with the Center for European Policy Analysis noting a shift in strategy “from smaller-scale strikes on storage tanks to targeting hard-to-replace refinery equipment, like cracking units, much of it western-made and subject to sanctions.”
If Ukraine continues to press its deep-strike campaign and Russia faces rolling or compounding infrastructure losses, the supply risk to global oil markets could rise meaningfully.
Russian oil supply is being further suppressed by renewed U.S. sanctions, most notably new restrictions on Russian oil majors Rosneft and Lukoil, effective Nov. 21, prohibiting transactions with the companies as Washington increases pressure on Moscow.
The broader oil market outlook, however, remains bearish (headed toward lower prices) with U.S. crude inventories rising and multiple warnings of a severe glut in 2026
“Ukraine was always the ‘Rheinmetall’ of the Soviet Union”
Yes, it was the core of the Soviet Defense Industrial Base, in many critical aspects.
Russian forces continue to advance and to intensify offensive operations in the Hulyaipole and Velykomykhailivka directions, exploiting the effects of battlefield air interdiction (BAI) and poor weather that hampers Ukrainian drone observation. Russian forces continued their advance toward Hulyaipole and the T-0401 Pokrovske-Hulyaipole highway — one of the main ground lines of communication (GLOCs) supplying Ukrainian forces in the town. Ukrainian and Russian statements indicate that Russian forces have advanced to positions near the villages of Solodke, Yablukove, and Vesele, within a roughly nine-kilometer range northeast and east of Hulyaipole.[1] Russian forces conducted infiltration operations further north toward Danylivka on the T-0401 highway as well. ISW assesses that the Russian 5th Combined Arms Army (CAA) and elements of the 36th CAA are attempting to isolate and possibly encircle Hulyaipole from the northeast in accordance with a new campaign design that aims to degrade Ukrainian defenses to enable advances through a combination of BAI, infiltration tactics, and advances. Elements of the Russian 35th CAA, deployed to the south and southwest of Hulyaipole, have reportedly redeployed to the 5th CAA sector.[2] The Russian military command thus seems unlikely to launch an effort to encircle Hulyaipole from the south at this time, likely because Ukrainian defenses in the area are strongest in that direction. The prospects for and timeline of this Russian effort remain unclear at this time, but the situation in the Hulyaipole direction is serious.
Geolocated footage published on November 13 shows Russian servicemembers raising Russian flags in Danylivka (southwest of Velykomykhailivka on the T-0401 highway) in what ISW assesses was an infiltration mission, likely through Tsehelne and Yehorivka (both just east of Danylivka and southwest of Velykomykhailivka).[3] Russian sources claimed that Russian forces seized Rivnopillya (northeast of Hulyaipole) and that elements of the Russian 5th Tank Brigade (36th CAA, Eastern Military District [EMD]) seized Danylivka.[4] Ukraine's Southern Operational Command reported on November 12 that Ukrainian forces withdrew from Rivnopillya on the evening of November 11, and Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief General Oleksandr Syrskyi stated on November 13 that Russian forces are operating near Solodke (north of Rivnopillya), Yablukove (south of Rivnopillya), and Vesele (southeast of Rivnopillya), indicating that Russian forces continue relatively rapid advances northeast and east of Hulyaipole.[5]
Ukrainian military observer Kostyantyn Mashovets reported on November 13 that elements of the Russian 37th Motorized Rifle Brigade (36th CAA) reached the Novooleksandrivka-Oleksiivka line (southwest of Velykomykhailivka), gained a foothold east of Yehorivka, and achieved “tactical successes” in the Yehorivka-Danylivka direction within the last two weeks.[6] Mashovets added that Russian forces also crossed the Yanchur River near Uspenivka (northeast of Hulyaipole) and advanced west to the Solodke-Rivnopillya line, covering a distance of seven kilometers.[7]
Mashovets noted that the Russian military command has concentrated elements of up to nine brigades and regiments, including one tank brigade, and up to six other regiment- and battalion-sized units and detachments, along a 41-kilometer front.[8] Mashovets noted that the Russian military command committed elements of the Russian 69th Covering Brigade and the 38th Motorized Rifle Brigade (both of the 35th CAA, EMD) to reinforce the efforts of the Russian 5th CAA and its 127th Motorized Rifle Division, likely east and northeast of Hulyaipole[9] Mashovets assessed that the Russian military command may also redeploy elements of the Russian 58th CAA (Southern Military District [SMD], operationally subordinated to the Dnepr Grouping of Forces) from western Zaporizhia Oblast and elements of the 98th Airborne (VDV) Division and 41st CAA (both of the Central Grouping of Forces) to further reinforce efforts in the Hulyaipole and Velykomykhailivka directions[10][11]
ISW continues to assess that the effects of a monthslong Russian BAI campaign targeting Ukrainian GLOCs in the Hulyaipole and Velykomykhailivka directions — including roads, highways, and railway lines — and worsening weather conditions that degrade Ukrainian drone effectiveness — have facilitated recent Russian advances.[12] A servicemember of the Russian 114th Motorized Rifle Regiment (127th Motorized Rifle Division) acknowledged on November 13 that Russian forces take advantage of foggy and rainy weather conditions to conduct assaults.[13] A Russian milblogger published footage on November 13 reportedly showing elements of the Russian 11th Air and Air Defense Forces Army (Russian Aerospace Forces [VKS] and EMD) conducting FAB guided glide bomb strikes against Ukrainian forces in Velykomykhailivka.[14]
Russian forces continue to advance in the Pokrovsk direction as Ukrainian forces continue counterattacks. Russian forces continue efforts to complete the encirclement of Ukrainian forces in Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad (east of Pokrovsk) by advancing through Rodynske, northeast of Pokrovsk, but the settlement remains contested. Geolocated footage published on November 13 indicates that Russian forces recently advanced in central Rodynske, and a Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces also advanced in southern Rodynske.[15] A Russian milblogger acknowledged that Ukrainian forces established a foothold in Rodynske, however.[16]
Pokrovsk itself remains contested as well. A Kremlin-affiliated Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces control areas of Pokrovsk south of the railway but that heavy fighting continues in northern Pokrovsk.[17] Geolocated footage published on November 12 and 13 indicates that Ukrainian forces still hold positions in the Pokrovsk City Council building in central Pokrovsk and that Ukrainian forces still operate in northwestern and north of Pokrovsk.[18] The Ukrainian General Staff reported on November 13 that Ukrainian forces cleared Russian positions on the western outskirts of Pokrovsk and near the entrance to Pokrovsk, likely referring to its northwestern entrance.[19] A Ukrainian regiment operating in the Pokrovsk direction reported that Ukrainian forces also cleared Russian positions in northern Pokrovsk, secured a logistics route into the town, and are operating along the Donetska railway.[20] A Ukrainian officer operating in the Pokrovsk direction reported that Russian forces continue to interdict Ukrainian logistics into Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad and will conduct assaults to draw fire from and subsequently attack Ukrainian drone and artillery crew positions.[21] The Ukrainian officer reported that Russian forces can strike a single Ukrainian position in the area with up to 10 Molniya strike drones, six bomber drones, and artillery and mortar fire within an hour.
A Russian milblogger complained that recent footage of Russian forces conducting logistics into Pokrovsk under the cover of fog allowed Ukrainian forces to interdict the effort. Russian milbloggers broadly amplified footage on November 10 and 11 showing Russian motorcycles, buggies, and transport trucks advancing into Pokrovsk under heavy fog, and open-source intelligence (OSINT) social media accounts geolocated the footage to southern Pokrovsk along the M-30 Selydove-Pokrovsk highway by November 11.[22] Russian milbloggers praised the tactic of advancing under fog cover that inhibits Ukrainian drone surveillance.[23] Another milblogger complained on November 12, however, that the “idiot who filmed” the video published it online and “so popular [mil]bloggers” underestimated the threat of Ukrainian artillery in a drone-dominated war, suggesting that the publication of the footage allowed Ukrainian artillery to strike Russian forces involved in the logistics effort.[24]
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov reiterated that the Kremlin remains unwilling to compromise on its long-held maximalist war aims that amount to Ukraine's complete capitulation. Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera requested an interview from Lavrov, and the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) published the alleged full transcript of the interview on November 13.[25] Lavrov claimed that the war in Ukraine is “not a war for territory” or an effort to bring Ukraine back within Russia's sphere of influence, but is meant to “reliably guarantee Russia's security” and to “thwart NATO and EU plans” to turn Ukraine into a “puppet state” hostile to Russia. Lavrov reiterated Russia's demand that Ukraine must commit to “neutrality” and adhere to the international agreements under which Russia recognized Ukrainian independence — implying that Ukraine has no sovereignty as long as it does not acquiesce to Russia's demands, which would certainly deprive Ukraine of its sovereignty. The Kremlin has consistently reiterated its commitment to its original war demands, which include Ukrainian “neutrality,” the removal of the legitimate government of Ukraine, the installation of a pro-Russian government, and changes to NATO's Open Door Policy.[26] Lavrov’s November 13 interview with a prominent Italian newspaper was likely meant to rebroadcast this commitment to a European audience as part of ongoing efforts to convince the West to cease supporting Ukraine as it defends against Russia's war of aggression.
Ukrainian forces continued their long-range strikes campaign against Russian energy infrastructure on the night of November 12 and 13 with the second known use of FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles. The Ukrainian General Staff stated that Ukrainian forces employed FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles and long-range Bars and Lyutyi drones in overnight strikes and published footage showing Ukrainian forces launching Flamingo cruise missiles, but did not specify against which exact targets.[27] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had stated on October 9 that Ukrainian forces employed Flamingo missiles in combat for the first time during the previous week but did not identify their targets.[28] A Ukrainian channel reporting on Mykolaiv Oblast reported on November 13 that Ukrainian forces struck Oryol City (roughly 173 kilometers from Ukraine) with an FP-5 Flamingo missile and posted footage of the missile.[29] Geolocated imagery shows damage to boiler and turbine buildings at the Oryol Thermal Power Plant in Oryol City.[30] Russian authorities issued a missile warning for Oryol Oblast overnight, and Oryol Oblast Governor Andrei Klychkov claimed on November 13 that Russian air defenses destroyed unspecified objects in the air over Oryol Oblast overnight.[31] Geolocated footage published on November 13 shows a fire, likely at a primary oil processing unit, at the Nizhnekamsk Oil Refinery in the Republic of Tatarstan.[32] Refinery officials acknowledged a fire at the plant but did not identify the cause.[33]
Russian forces continue to commit war crimes against Ukrainian civilians. Geolocated footage published on November 13 shows the aftermath of a Russian drone strike against civilians traveling along the P-79 Kupyansk-Borova highway north of Novoplatonivka (north of Borova).[34] The Ukrainian Kharkiv Oblast Prosecutor's Office reported on November 13 that the strike murdered three civilians and injured a fourth civilian heading southward toward Borova to receive humanitarian aid and pensions.[35] The deliberate murder of civilians is a violation of the international legal principle of distinction that requires that parties only target combatants and civilians directly participating in hostilities.[36] Russian forces use tactics to interdict Ukrainian ground lines of communications (GLOCs) that involve indiscriminately striking vehicles and people traveling on roadways, frequently leading to Ukrainian civilian casualties. ISW has long assessed that the Russian military command is endorsing and sometimes ordering war crimes on the battlefield.[37]
Ukraine's European allies continue to provide monetary aid to Ukraine, including to support military requirements. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced that the European Union (EU) provided Ukraine with an additional 6 billion euros (roughly $7 billion) in direct budget assistance on November 13.[38] Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko announced on November 13 that Ukraine received the final tranche of funding, worth 4.1 billion euros (roughly $4.8 billion), from the interest on seized Russian assets through the Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration (ERA) framework and 1.8 billion euros (roughly $2 billion) of funding through the EU’s Ukraine Facility program.[39] NATO announced on November 13 that several European states will fund a joint $500 million military equipment and munitions package for Ukraine through the Prioritized Ukrainian Requirements List (PURL) initiative, which funds NATO purchases of US-made weapons for Ukraine.[40] Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, and Sweden will contribute to the joint package.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
