Posted on 09/26/2022 8:13:23 AM PDT by bitt
All of his claims are based on copious evidence. There has been zero argument with the evidence, simply the pejorative label ‘dangerous claims and erratic behavior’.
Many corporate cowards don’t want to be called ‘anti-vax’.
Find an argument with the evidence.
Stop calling them vaccines!
servantoftheservant wrote: “All of his claims are based on copious evidence. There has been zero argument with the evidence, simply the pejorative label ‘dangerous claims and erratic behavior’.”
Simply untrue.
https://healthfeedback.org/authors/steve-kirsch/
“As Kirsch has gone deeper into the anti-vaccine scene, many professional associates have increasingly distanced themselves from him. In May, all 12 members of CETF’s scientific advisory board resigned, citing his alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior. Over the summer, the conflict reached his most recent startup, M10. Its board told him that if he wanted to remain part of the company he would have to stop making public anti-vaccine statements. In September, he resigned as CEO and gave up his board seat.”
“In May, all 12 members of CETF’s scientific advisory board resigned, citing his alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior.”
What, exactly, are the ‘dangerous claims’?
Is there an evidentiary argument that counters the scientific studies Kirsch relies on? LOL
servantoftheservant wrote: “What, exactly, are the ‘dangerous claims’? Is there an evidentiary argument that counters the scientific studies Kirsch relies on? LOL”
Doesn’t it give you pause that all 12 members of his technical advisors of his technical board resigned over what they characterized as his “alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior”.
Then shortly thereafter the board of another of his startup companies, M10, “told him that if he wanted to remain part of the company he would have to stop making public anti-vaccine statements.”
These are troubling statements that reflect directly upon whether one should believe Kirsch.
There is a code of Orwellian ‘right-think’ vigorously enforced in corporate America. Being associated with ‘wrong-think’ is career limiting. It doesn’t surprise me at all that advisors that rely on corporate money would resign.
Saying the vax is neither effective nor safe is like saying the Emperor has no clothes. It’s true, but the bots are shocked and dismayed.
servantoftheservant wrote: “Saying the vax is neither effective nor safe is like saying the Emperor has no clothes. It’s true, but the bots are shocked and dismayed.”
Saying the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous is far more career limiting since corporations do not wish to be associated with those who believe in vaccine/virus conspiracies.
He believed the wrong people.
Copious scientific data show the vax is neither safe nor effective. Kirsch has simply posted these studies and their inescapable conclusion.
Argue with the data instead repeating platitudes like some retarded Maoist. LOL
“. Kirsch has simply posted these studies”
LOL! That global warming Gore supporting dude has perpetuated unbased conspiracies.
Hello TexasGator, Not sure if you are advocating that the MRNA Covid 19 vaccines are both safe and effective.
Please parse your argument.
Which study on vaccine efficacy that Kirsch posted is false and why?
“Which study on vaccine efficacy that Kirsch posted is false and why?”.
Pick one and we can discuss.
“Argue with the data”
With Kirsch it is Parse the Data
Kirsch said that the shots affected Biden’s brain. Maybe they also affected Kirsch’s.
LOL. You’re not serious.
Is it your position that the MRNA Covid vaccines are both safe and effective?
YOU pick one. You’re the one who has an issue with an unnamed study posted by Kirsch.
I find Kirsch’s Substack to be quite solid and persuasive on the topic of MRNA Covid ‘vaccines’.
“YOU pick one. You’re the one who has an issue with an unnamed study posted by Kirsch.”
I didn’t bring up his “studies”. You did.
Are you mentally retarded?
I brought up the studies Kirsch has posted in response to Dugway Duke who mentioned Kirsch’s ‘dangerous claims’ in relation to Covid vaccines.
What are the ‘dangerous claims’ unsupported by scientific data, and why are they dangerous?
I can see this is a struggle for you. Best wishes.
“I brought up the studies Kirsch “
That is what I said. You brought them up, not me.
“Thousands of paid subscribers”
If Kirsch is so rich, why is requiring payments to read his stupid newsletter?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.