Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the FBI really raided Mar a Lago
Flopping Aces ^ | 08-09-22 | DrJohn

Posted on 08/10/2022 8:19:33 AM PDT by Starman417

Spending time on Twitter can be illuminating. Never have I seen so much spamming going on from the left all about how Trump "stole" classified documents. You could call it the "Crapper Caper." I have repeatedly pointed out that the President can declassify anything he chooses. But it's not about that. It's about something very different.

Trump and his lawyers were cooperating with the National Archives and had already returned 15 boxes of materials. Than came a June meeting:

Trump's attorneys were present at that meeting and the sources say the former president himself stopped in to say hello for a few minutes.

The meeting came months after the National Archives -- with assistance from the Justice Department -- was able to get 15 boxes of documents sent back to Washington, D.C. after expressing concern they were in Florida.

The June meeting was about additional documents that were being sought. But following it, the Justice Department and FBI felt they weren't getting the same cooperation they had been receiving earlier in the probe, according to a source with knowledge of negotiations between Trump's team and the federal entities.

The perceived lack of cooperation is why a search warrant was requested and ultimately executed on Monday, Aug. 8 at Trump's Palm Beach property.

"Perceived lack of cooperation."  Note that Trump was not present. Perceived lack of cooperation is subjective. Without question, the Feds decided to perceive a lack of cooperation as a premise to ransack Trump's place. Lawyers were not allowed to observe as the FBI took everything, relevant to the visit or not.

Today Andrew McCarthy opined that the raid was not about classified documents, but rather a fishing expedition for the Jan 6 Satr Chamber

The Justice Department obviously used the potential classified information as a pretext to obtain a warrant so it could search for what it is really looking for: evidence that would tie Trump to a Capitol riot offense – either a violent crime, such as seditious conspiracy to forcibly attack a government installation (which is highly unlikely), or a non-violent crime, such as conspiracy to obstruct the January 6 joint session of Congress to count electoral votes, or conspiracy to defraud the government.
He may be right or partly right. As we've noted previously, Kash Patel asserts that the documents present at Mar a Lago were already declassified but did not have the appropriate markings. Back in May Patel made a pretty good prediction:
“If they selectively leak stuff — and given this week’s Supreme Court leak, you can’t put it past anyone at the NARA or Congress who might have some of these documents and leak them to advance a false political narrative,” he said.
That is what transpired. This, however, is what I find interesting:
“They are not a classification authority. I don’t believe they have unilateral authority to reclassify something the president declassified. They are the holder of records,” he said.

Patel did not want to get into what the specific documents were, predicting claims from the left that he was disclosing “classified” material, but said, “It’s information that Trump felt spoke to matters regarding everything from Russiagate to the Ukraine impeachment fiasco to major national security matters of great public importance — anything the president felt the American people had a right to know is in there and more.”

That's important as it dovetails into something I wrote about late last night. Paul Sperry had a similar notion and posted this, and was immediately suspended by Twitter

(Excerpt) Read more at Floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 15boxes; blogpimp; christopherawray; christopherwray; creepstate; declass; deepstate; fbi; impeachment; policestate; politicizationoffbi; russiagate; singlepartystate; sperry; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 08/10/2022 8:19:33 AM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

This likes to hear himself talk... I wonder if he reads to himself in front of a mirror...


2 posted on 08/10/2022 8:22:40 AM PDT by sit-rep ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
It's yet another corrupt libtard scam to take out their political enemies everyone knows it. They are lawbreaking fascists and need to be imprisoned
3 posted on 08/10/2022 8:24:01 AM PDT by NWFree (Somebody has to say it 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

It’s all about covering for their own criminality.


4 posted on 08/10/2022 8:24:35 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Leftists are such idiots Trump could declassify ALL of those documents BEFORE he left the WH, he didn’t have to STEAL classified documents GEEZE these people are beyond STUPID!!


5 posted on 08/10/2022 8:25:16 AM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Why the FBI really raided Mar a Lago

Because they needed a new wardrobe.


6 posted on 08/10/2022 8:27:42 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Raid is such a loaded term. The DOJ prefers “dropping by to say hey”.


7 posted on 08/10/2022 8:31:38 AM PDT by fightin kentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

That’s terrific!


8 posted on 08/10/2022 8:33:20 AM PDT by FamiliarFace (I wish “smart resume” would work for the real world so I could FF through the Burden admin BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Hillary Clinton was receiving and sending classified information on her personal computer at her home.

Response?

Nothing.

No FBI raid.

Nothing.

We are not a nation of laws.

We are a nation of lawyers.

Lawyers dedicated to enriching themselves.


9 posted on 08/10/2022 8:39:44 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

And no doubt the Kremlin and the CCP have those Hillary docs. Dems couldn’t care less.


10 posted on 08/10/2022 8:42:17 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

We all know why they raided Trump’s residence.

The question is what and where is the PROBABLE CAUSE (evidence of a crime) required by the 4th Amendment to raid his house? (A warrant without a declaration of reasonable probable cause is an invalid warrant.)

If the raid was about clear evidence of criminal activity regarding classified documents, that could be enough probable cause to allow a search.

However, if the raid was a “fishing expedition” (NO probable cause to search but rather trying to FIND probable cause, which the dictatorial and unconstitutional rogue Left loves to do) then the search was unconstitutional and, thus, illegal and those in charge of the FBI raid should themselves be held responsible for criminal activity against Trump and the American People.


11 posted on 08/10/2022 8:42:45 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

If Trump‘s attorneys were not present… we can assume that the feds could (probably DID) plant anything they wanted to.

What a joke


12 posted on 08/10/2022 8:44:45 AM PDT by SMARTY (“Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.” Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

They’re not stupid as much as they’re dishonest. I’ve tried to explain that to leftists, but they persist in telling their lies


13 posted on 08/10/2022 8:44:53 AM PDT by lowbridge ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

CLASSIFIED documents are normally marked as such.

Such documents should also be marked to indicate that they have been declassified and by whom and when.


14 posted on 08/10/2022 8:45:59 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Paul Sperry had a similar notion and posted this, and was immediately suspended by Twitter

Off topic, but Musk has sure gone silent.

15 posted on 08/10/2022 8:46:49 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

The Democrats have been getting their donkeys kicked.

They will attack back.

Their attacks are predictable.

Guns.

Taxes.

Republicans.

They should be attacked back on issues that frighten them.

Illegal immigration.

Abortion.

Ukraine spending.


16 posted on 08/10/2022 8:49:20 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Raid? It was a home invasion under the color of law.

17 posted on 08/10/2022 8:49:48 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

CLASSIFIED documents should be stored in a safe and must be signed out and back in and so witnessed.


18 posted on 08/10/2022 8:50:16 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
The Deep State™ Pretorian Guard lashing out, maybe on their own.
19 posted on 08/10/2022 8:51:11 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

And reducing government employees.


20 posted on 08/10/2022 8:51:28 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson