Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What would a conservative environmentalism stand for? (A Personal Post)
https://wemustbegreen.com ^ | 11th February, 20121 Australian time | Ozguy1945

Posted on 02/09/2021 6:54:00 PM PST by Ozguy1945

Conservatives conserve what's good.

God's gift of life is good.

What other basic principles would underpin a conservative environmentalism?


TOPICS: Education; Health/Medicine; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: conservation; conservatism; environment; green; howmanyblogsdoyougot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2021 6:54:00 PM PST by Ozguy1945
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

Well Ducks Unlimited, most any reasonable hunter or farmer could tell you.

Stewards of their own land.


2 posted on 02/09/2021 7:00:15 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Clean air - clean water - clean land


3 posted on 02/09/2021 7:03:42 PM PST by mksee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

Control pollution, the goal being to protect people, not the planet. People are more important than the planet, not vice versa.

The EPA was originally call the PCA - Pollution Control Agency. Started in Nixon administration.


4 posted on 02/09/2021 7:06:16 PM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
I’m interested in green energy, but from a libertarian perspective of putting solar panels on my roof, a battery or two for when the sun goes down, and maybe a hydrogen electrolyzer/storage unit for long term backup (ie winter).


Why? So I won’t be at the mercy of monopolist and utility companies cronied with both local and federal govt jacking up prices ostensibly to save us with their control freak rationing of power:

5 posted on 02/09/2021 7:06:26 PM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

Every home should produce a fraction of its own energy, harvest water, grow food, etc that those there are not beholden to others for sustenance.


6 posted on 02/09/2021 7:10:07 PM PST by ctdonath2 (Interesting how those so interested in workERS are so disinterested in workING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

Nuclear power, coal-to-gas conversion, hydro power, hydrogen.


7 posted on 02/09/2021 7:12:34 PM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

A credo I’ve lived as a lifetime angler: Leave it a little nicer than how you found it. It requires little to no effort.


8 posted on 02/09/2021 7:13:27 PM PST by Viking2002 (The revolution won't need to be televised. It'll be on your doorstep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Fruser1

Bingo !! Spot on !!!

The PCA/EPA created by the great Republican Richard Nixon was there to clean up our messes. Clean up pollution.

But.... as with everything the Left gets into...it morphs into lunacy. Climate change. Remember protecting the desert rat in California? It’s a rat for heaven’s sake !!! It has rabies.

Wetlands? Every square inch is now a wetland so no one can use it.
I could go on and on.


9 posted on 02/09/2021 7:19:45 PM PST by TheGreatFazool (The Great Fazool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

The natural world is a resource to be wisely stewarded, not a deity to be worshipped nor a museum to be left utterly untouched.


10 posted on 02/09/2021 7:22:22 PM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

Science/evidence based programs to actually keep the environment clean. Like picking up trash, enforcing the laws to prevent toxic chemicals from being dumped into waterways, etc.


11 posted on 02/09/2021 7:25:14 PM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

Surrender monkey syndrome...


12 posted on 02/09/2021 7:25:19 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Joe McCarthy now that we desperately need him sober?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945
Clear and simple:


13 posted on 02/09/2021 7:26:28 PM PST by conservativeimage (I’d rather die a free spirit than enter into heaven without a soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

“The natural world is a resource to be wisely stewarded, not a deity to be worshipped nor a museum to be left utterly untouched.”

what else needs to be said about stewardship?


14 posted on 02/09/2021 7:31:59 PM PST by Ozguy1945 (, many others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

We have a hot water solar system that heats our pool and preheats all the water before it goes into our hot water heater. The hot water runs under the kitchen floor and the floor of our kitchen, making the cold winters in western NY more comfortable. We have passive solar in the form of big windows facing south. We heat our home with a wood stove stoked with wood harvested on our own land. It saves us money without earth unfriendly solar panels. It is a small part of our overall prepping.


15 posted on 02/09/2021 7:34:46 PM PST by Bookwoman (And I am unanimous in that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Totally agree.


16 posted on 02/09/2021 7:36:32 PM PST by Bookwoman (And I am unanimous in that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

Responsible management of natural resources. Technological advances that promote cleaner air and water. More efficient production and use of energy, making use of a diversity of resources. Would government have a role? Yes. I would favor penalties for those who wantonly trash the environment. I would favor government being involved in conserving natural areas. That is being done now, but it needs to be scaled back into some sane limits, ideally to balance conservation and human use. Individuals need to learn to pick up after themselves — garbage, dog doo, etc. Headed over to Illinois one day, I saw a sign on the tollway that reminded people how important it was not to litter. Then I made it a point to look at all of the trash strewn along the highways and streets all the way to my destination.

I think a conservative environmentalism would be driven from the bottom up, and be realized by free-market solutions, just as most progress has been accomplished. No more government boneheads telling us what light bulbs to buy or planning to wean us off petroleum. No more big-money government boondoggles. Educate people to be more responsible, provide products and services that make their lives and environment better, and see what happens.


17 posted on 02/09/2021 7:47:21 PM PST by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

From the Bible...

“As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God’s varied graces”

Which I interpret as “use it but don’t abuse it”. Be good responsible stewards of God’s creation.


18 posted on 02/09/2021 7:48:04 PM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945

Take what you need. Use what you take. Don’t waste things. Clean up the area around you.


19 posted on 02/09/2021 7:50:20 PM PST by Rembrandt (-a sure sign a Dem is lying - his lips are moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozguy1945
There is nothing wrong with environmental awareness. The issue is that for conservatives, it must be voluntary and not coerced by government. If you want to recycle, say, fine— go ahead. But it is not for government to tell you to do so much less coerce you to separate garbage, eg.

I find even some conservatives misunderstand this: the issue is not whether you want to preserve the environment, the issue is government control vs personal free choice.

20 posted on 02/09/2021 7:53:15 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson