Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING UPDATE: Judge Timothy Batten Issues Order to Freeze All Dominion Machines in Georgia!
GP ^ | November 29, 2020 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 11/29/2020 12:49:48 PM PST by White Lives Matter

BREAKING UPDATE— Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. issued an order on Sunday to freeze ALL Dominion voting machines in the state of Georgia.

Via Attorney Linn Wood: “Defendants are ordered to maintain the statue quo & are temporarily enjoined from wiping or resetting any voting machines in the State of Georgia until further order of the Court.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: criminals; dominion; dubyajudge; electionfraud; georgia; joebiden; judge; judiciary; linwood; ndgeorgia; pearsonvkemp; politicaljudiciary; sidneypowell; stopcourt; timothybatten; timothycbatten; timothycbattensr; trump; voterfraud; votingfraud; votingmachines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: maggief

that’s the one where he rescinded his order?


61 posted on 11/29/2020 2:35:21 PM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: BillyCuccio

The electoral college votes on Dec 14. It’s a wrap at that point unless the electoral college can’t agree.


62 posted on 11/29/2020 2:38:16 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

That’s my understanding per Lin’s post.

https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1333162995103510534


63 posted on 11/29/2020 2:42:26 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION

The case was before a Federal Judge. The reversal by this Judge to me is an act of treason, and I am not one to easily use hyperbole. In fact, I am the opposite.

It is an act of treason because these machines contain evidentiary data owned not only by the people of Georgia but by all the citizens of the United States.

This Judge has without question jurisdiction over such evidence. Lin Wood tweets the machines are owned by the state not the counties.

GA Patriots need to be at the county election offices where the machines are kept ASAP! Go to counties where fraud was egregious. Fulton County comes to mind. There are others.

Someone with ground knowledge please list the GA counties committing the most fraud.


64 posted on 11/29/2020 2:42:40 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

not a lawyer, but if this judge (Batten) produces an order in defiance of established GA state case law, then he would be opening himself to impeachment and worse (yes?). he already showed willingness to go the extra mile beforehand, so i do not think it is a case of judicial fraud.

what jurisdiction is this in (eg Florida state appellate?)

Jacobson v. Fla. Sec’y of
State, 974 F.3d 1236, 1256– 58 (11th Cir. 2020)

if so, how is Georgia bound by a Florida opinion?

from a higher level, it seems to me that all the necessary legal horsepower suited to the task at hand would be available if the matter were criminal. the matter is not at this moment in time criminal. if so, then ideally some sheriffs, DAs, or the state AG could at least in theory swoop in with a warrant and seize the machines in question. ideally it would only require to be done in a few counties.

if the matter can be construed as a federal crime, then the feds could do the same. that would require a fed DA for Georgia, or the FBI, or the DOJ.

In the extreme, perhaps Trump could declare an insurrection (but i think the optics might be unfavorable for that).

Another extreme (just exploring all of the possibilities here) would be for the two republican senator candidates to concede to their democratic counterparts, thus voiding the need for a runoff election and voiding the need for resetting any machines, presuming those were the only elections required to be run in the counties in question.

(I think there are something like 5 counties in most question, centered in the Atlanta area.)

Isn’t there enough info for Wray or Barr to start an investigation?


65 posted on 11/29/2020 2:46:55 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Anyone able to find and post the relevant parts of this decision?

Jacobson v. Fla. Sec’y of State, 974 F.3d 1236, 1256– 58 (11th Cir. 2020)


66 posted on 11/29/2020 2:48:55 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BlueHorseShoe

Does destroying evidence assume guilt in law?
Is this so?


67 posted on 11/29/2020 2:49:28 PM PST by reviled downesdad (Some of the lost will never believe the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter

For all the reasons cited in this thread, the pro-Trump lawyers need to raise a “perception of fairness” argument in every law suit.

Kline is capable of understanding what I mean. Powell and Wood are not. Widburg could explain it to them all.


68 posted on 11/29/2020 2:50:48 PM PST by Gratia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LilFarmer; patriotfury; All

Powell has access to the seized Frankfurt servers. Those servers have the data and the code used to manipulate all machines in the United States involved in electronic fraud.

This GA Federal Judge better get his life insurance ready because he’s either kowtowing to the Clinton Mob or he’s looking at Treason against the United States. He and quite a few others.

It’s time for the following to go down in GA counties:

The Battle of Athens Tenn 1946
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9tUQxsrQGw&feature=emb_logo

There’s plenty of history background about this battle that can be found on the internet.

If GA Patriots do not make a stand here, they won’t anywhere.


69 posted on 11/29/2020 2:56:27 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
what jurisdiction is this in (eg Florida state appellate?) Jacobson v. Fla. Sec’y of State, 974 F.3d 1236, 1256– 58 (11th Cir. 2020) if so, how is Georgia bound by a Florida opinion?

It's a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, so it is binding on all federal district courts in that Circuit (Florida, Alabama and Georgia).

70 posted on 11/29/2020 2:57:14 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

many thanks


71 posted on 11/29/2020 2:58:29 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

i wonder if we could tell whether the original action was brought in state or federal jurisdiction...


72 posted on 11/29/2020 3:00:01 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
Anyone able to find and post the relevant parts of this decision? Jacobson v. Fla. Sec’y of State, 974 F.3d 1236, 1256– 58 (11th Cir. 2020)

The decision is here. I think the relevant language is on pages 24-31.

73 posted on 11/29/2020 3:03:30 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: LilFarmer; Jane Long; Liz
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1333182964650348546

Lin Wood
@LLinWood

Looks like @GaSecofState Brad Raffensperger DOES do business at Eaton Corporation. State business. Voting related.

Do GA Patriots think Raffesperger is corrupt & knee deep in the fraudulent election or is it just me?

(video clip)

https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1333181456219246592

Lin Wood
@LLinWood

Does @GaSecofState Brad Raffensperger operate a branch office at Eaton Corporation?

4:50 PM · Nov 29, 2020

74 posted on 11/29/2020 3:05:52 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
i wonder if we could tell whether the original action was brought in state or federal jurisdiction...

The case before Judge Batten? It was filed in federal court in Georgia, which is why Batten is bound by the 11th Circuit's rulings.

75 posted on 11/29/2020 3:06:52 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SteveH; All

Repeating this paragraph from the reversed order:

“However, Plaintiffs’ request fails because the voting equipment that they seek to impound is in the possession of county election officials. Any injunction the Court issues would extend only to Defendants and those within their control, and Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that county election officials are within Defendants’ control. Defendants cannot serve as a proxy for local election officials against whom the relief should be sought. Jacobson v. Fla. Sec’y of State , 974 F.3d 1236, 1256 – 58 (11th Cir. 2020)”

*******************

Regarding the citation, I’m not keen on ‘Justia’ in general, but reading their summary seems to indicate the cited case appears irrelevant. The Lin Wood case was one of fraud, not of ballot formatting.

Justia Opinion Summary
At issue in this appeal is whether several voters and organizations have standing to challenge a law that governs the order in which candidates appear on the ballot in Florida’s general elections. The voters and organizations alleged that the law violates their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments because candidates who appear first on the ballot—in recent years, Republicans—enjoy a “windfall vote” from a small number of voters who select the first candidate on a ballot solely because of that candidate’s position of primacy. The district court permanently enjoined the Secretary from preparing ballots in accordance with the law.

The Eleventh Circuit vacated and remanded with instructions to dismiss for lack of justiciability, holding that the voters and organizations lack standing to sue the Secretary, because none of them proved an injury in fact. Furthermore, any injury they might suffer is neither fairly traceable to the Secretary nor redressable by a judgment against her because she does not enforce the challenged law. Rather, the county officials independent of the Secretary (the Supervisors) are responsible for placing candidates on the ballot in the order the law prescribes. Therefore, the court held that the district court lacked authority to enjoin those officials in this action and it was powerless to provide redress.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/19-14552/19-14552-2020-04-29.html


76 posted on 11/29/2020 3:12:14 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
reading their summary seems to indicate the cited case appears irrelevant. The Lin Wood case was one of fraud, not of ballot formatting.

The case stands for the proposition that you have to sue the person who can do what you want the court to order them to do; you can't sue the Secretary of State to change the ballot order if the counties are in charge of that. Same thing here: you can't sue the Secretary of State to preserve voting machines if the counties are the ones who have control of the voting machines. It would be like me suing my brother-in-law and asking for an order that you turn over your house to me.

77 posted on 11/29/2020 3:18:53 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SteveH; All

The more I review the link in #76, I can see plainly what happened.

This Judge pulled a citation out of his butt (clerk found or was handed, emailed) and quickly reversed with this stupid citation.

The citation case and this GA case are apples and oranges regarding county election officials.

County election officials are NOT immune from every challenge that comes their way.

Any experienced lawyer of repute will confirm this was a red herring to throw the previous order. This Judge could have eaily allowed his 1st order to stand and let the Defendants’ lawyers squirm before the 11th Ckt while the district court’s order to enjoin stayed in effect. No, this Judge bowed to pressure.

Yes, I smell Clinton Mob.


78 posted on 11/29/2020 3:25:46 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; All

> “Same thing here: you can’t sue the Secretary of State to preserve voting machines if the counties are the ones who have control of the voting machines.”

Why do you bother to comment when you don’t have all the facts? If it were me, I would make the comment in the frame of a question to indicate I may not know all that is relevant.

I rely on Lin Wood’s integrity. He said, and it is true, the State of GA OWNS the machines,

Those who OWN are the ones that ‘control’. The notion of ‘possession’ is irrelevant. It goes to ownership.

And the case was brought under a criminal statute of fraud and the need to preserve criminal evidence. The case before the 11th had nothing to do with fraud.

The Judge had no liability to let the 1st order stand. The 2nd order appears coerced.


79 posted on 11/29/2020 3:34:13 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Yep the state owns them

https://statescoop.com/georgia-buys-new-voting-machines-with-paper-trails/


80 posted on 11/29/2020 3:35:09 PM PST by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson