Posted on 01/13/2020 2:01:46 PM PST by Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
What if you were to shop at your local Home Depot in Pennsylvania, pick up a few plumbing parts, some pipe, solder, and a few screws? Should you have to submit to a background check, or check out at the register through an FFL licensee to buy that stuff? All because the stuff you bought could be used to build a gun? While it's entirely unlikely (and unrealistic), that's the kind of precedent which could technically be set, if Governor Tom Wolf’s and Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro’s new legal opinion is interpreted literally, as the Governor and AG clearly intend.
In yet another example of unconstitutional anti-gun decision-making, the state’s highest lawyer issued the above opinion letter declaring 80% lowers – non-functioning receiver blanks commonly used by gun owners and enthusiasts to build firearms at home, which is entirely legal by the ATF’s policy and federal law – as firearms. Except these units are not, in any way, shape or form, legally considered firearms. The ATF says so.
What gives?
Josh Shapiro appeared to take the route of “clarifying perceived ambiguity”, taking advantage of the existing law’s language clearly intended for one thing, and using it to justify his reasoning. Shapiro states:
“A receiver does not need to be fully manufactured to be a firearm as defined in the Applicable Sections. A receiver is a firearm under the Applicable Sections if it is: 1) “designed” to expel or 2) “may readily be converted” to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive. Given the [Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act] does not provide a statutory definition of these terms, [Pennsylvania State Police] shall utilize the legal framework set forth in this Opinion when enforcing or issuing interpretative guidance regarding the Applicable Sections of the UFA.
Along with direct enforcement of the UFA, PSP has the ability to issue interpretative rules through internal documents, manuals, or policy statements; while not controlling, these interpretations would be entitled to deference. Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944). Additionally, PSP can further interpret the definitions through formal rulemaking. 18 Pa. C.S. 6111.5 Any regulation properly promulgated by PSP is entitled to deference, unless clearly erroneous.”
To cement his position, Shapiro even says, "Under the statute, it doesn’t matter that these are not fully finished products. They are receivers and, therefore, they are firearms. Pure and simple.” They are not receivers, though. Again, federal law and decades of ATF policy say otherwise. By his own logic, a box of hardware from your general store could be labeled a gun, too. Shapiro has yet to clarify how he would effectively prevent this from happening.
Suddenly deciding things that clearly aren't guns are, well, suddenly guns (and giving the authority to decide such a thing to the State Police, who are certainly not the appropriate legal experts) is all well and good in Shapiro's eyes. Except he and Gov. Wolf seems to forget that only the state’s General Assembly can write such laws, and that the General Assembly cannot delegate its authority to the Attorney General or the Governor to implement wanton rule-making in such a fashion.
Shapiro’s entire brief is also misleading. Although his own words mention attempting to target receiver blanks for guns like the AR-15, nowhere does his “opinion” state that “80% lowers shall be considered firearms”. Instead, the Attorney General and Governor Tom Wolf are effectively passing that responsibility onto the State Police. Giving law enforcement carte blanche to decide whether something is illegal in this context, without any official law on the books, is sure to ignite a number of court filings and it will certainly spur even more opposition to Pennsylvania’s anti-gun movement, as we’ve recently seen.
Counties across Pennsylvania are beginning to declare themselves “Second Amendment Sanctuaries” just as so many have in Virginia, with Commissioners in Bradford County being the latest to take a stance against more undue gun control.
Look to California for further developments. They are after gun parts as “pre-cursors”. The emphasis is to inhibit assembled uppers on AR platforms for now. That will be expanded to various parts such as springs and firing pins on other firearms. Do not underestimate this nut. He will push as far and hard as he can get away with.
Opinion's are like a gluteus maximus, everybody has one, and some stink more than other's.
For those not up on their Latin, "gluteus maximus."
The largest muscle in the body is the gluteus maximus. Located at the back of the hip, it is also known as the buttocks, a.k.a. your A$$-HOLE!
“A competent gunsmith can turn a VW Bug into a machinegun within 8 hours.”
But what does it use for ammo once all four pistons have been thrown?
Slam fire shotgun YouYube starts at :19.
Lousy sound, but it is Caveman Simple
Extraction problems? I saw one where the guy had a reversible barrel, so he just flipped it around and shot out the fired case with the next shot.
The left believe limits on governmental power are abominations to be eliminated and overcome.
Yes. That increases the rate of fire.
Just about as easy to make a reversible barrel.
Maybe 20 minutes extra work, probably less...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.