Posted on 10/08/2019 9:58:25 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
If a law firm is representing at least two supposed whistleblowers, why would they have the whistleblower with only second hand information come out first versus the supposed whistleblower who claimed to have first hand information? This video examines the ABSURD dynamics of this situation. A situation in which serial whistleblowers who are all intelligence officials are blowing the whistle on something OUTSIDE their own department. When has this ever happened before?
Whistleblower Aid cofounder Mark Zaid was involved in the case of Op Merlin leaker Jeffrey Alexander Sterling and reporter James Risen.
Sterling held the Iran desk at the CIA.
I wonder if he was tried just for leaking Op Merlin or for other reasons, namely as a message for bringing up Clinton era’s transfer of supposedly flawed nuke design to Iran using a Russian scientist. Recall Hazel O’Leary’s idea that everyone should have nukes
Of course, OTOH, there isn't any secondhand or firsthand whistleblower, because the whole thing is just another DNC talking point / LIE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.