Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: sailor76

The fort belonged to the United States of America. It wasn’t their place to be evicting US troops from a US fort - politely or otherwise.


443 posted on 06/24/2018 10:39:51 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies ]


To: rockrr
The fort belonged to the United States of America. It wasn’t their place to be evicting US troops from a US fort - politely or otherwise.
================

And since that territory was no longer part of the United States, and since the United States and the Confederacy didn't have a treaty concerning such forts; the presence of the Fort became a hostile military action against the Confederacy.

The rest is history.

448 posted on 06/24/2018 11:49:16 AM PDT by sailor76 ( TRUMP, is still my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr
Not when the people became independent. The land always belongs to the inhabitants. Even Lincoln said so.

Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable, a most sacred right—a right which, we hope and believe, is to liberate the world. Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing government may choose to exercise it. Any portion of such people that can may revolutionize, and make their own of so much of the territory as they inhabit.

523 posted on 06/26/2018 7:17:14 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson