Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: hardspunned
Hitler’s generals and admirals could not get him the transport or protect them to cross the channel. Would have taken more than the Normandy invasion.
When you put it in that perspective, it becomes obvious. The British land forces would have been much weaker than the Werhmacht, since they left their equipment at Dunkirk. OTOH the RAF was a lot stronger in 1940 than the Luftwaffe was in 1944, and in 1940 the Royal Navy was also more powerful than the 1944 Kriegsmarine (tho the issue would have been decided primarily by the contest between the Luftwaffe and the RAF). It was far too close to being a fair fight to have been an attractive option for the German military.

63 posted on 07/23/2017 4:44:54 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (A press can be 'associated,' or a press can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

The Germany Navy wasn’t strong enough to take Britain, building up the Kriegsmarine was not high on Hitler’s list. He thought the U-Boats were all he needed.


69 posted on 07/23/2017 4:50:49 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Germany had NO prospects of successfully invading the British Isles. They had no experience in amphibious operations, no equipment to successfully conduct an invasion, and no way to combat either the Royal Navy or the Royal Air Force.

If you read this link you’ll be shocked at how ridiculous German planning was:

http://www.johndclare.net/wwii6_sealion.htm


75 posted on 07/23/2017 5:14:39 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson